CVE-2026-0496
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSAP Fiori App Intercompany Balance Reconciliation allows an attacker with high privileges to upload any file (including script files) without proper file format validation. This has low impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSAP Fiori App Intercompany Balance Reconciliation lacks proper file format validation on its file upload functionality, allowing authenticated high-privilege users to upload arbitrary file types including executable scripts. This arbitrary file upload vulnerability could enable remote code execution or serve as a vector for further compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm SAP Fiori Intercompany Balance Reconciliation app deploymentAccess SAP Fiori Launchpad and search for the Intercompany Balance Reconciliation application, or query SAP system tables (e.g., /UI2/APPSET, /UI2/APPS) for app identificationAffected if The application is present in the SAP Fiori environment
-
Identify the file upload endpointReview the application's UI components and network traffic when accessing the upload feature. Check SAP Gateway service definitions for upload-related OData operationsAffected if File upload functionality exists and is accessible in the app
-
Check if upload functionality is enabled for high-privilege usersReview SAP PFCG roles and the app's security configuration to determine which user roles can access the upload featureAffected if Authenticated users with elevated privileges can access the upload interface
-
Inspect file validation configurationExamine the backend ABAP handler or SAP Gateway service code that processes file uploads. Check for allowlist-based file type validation, MIME type verification, and content inspectionAffected if No strict file format validation is implemented, or validation relies only on file extension without content-type checking
-
Test upload capability with non-business file typesUsing an authenticated high-privilege account, attempt to upload a file with an executable extension (e.g., .jsp, .exe, .sh) through the application's upload endpointAffected if The system accepts and stores files with potentially dangerous extensions without rejection
The environment is affected if the SAP Fiori Intercompany Balance Reconciliation app is deployed with its file upload functionality accessible to authenticated high-privilege users and lacking proper allowlist-based file format validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist-based file format validation and content-type checking on all file upload endpoints, restricting uploads to expected business document formats only.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0496 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0496 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data