Document Management SystemApplication · Sap

CVE-2026-0505

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The BSP applications allow an unauthenticated user to manipulate user-controlled URL parameters that are not sufficiently validated. This could result in unvalidated redirection to attacker-controlled websites, leading to a low impact on confidentiality and integrity, and no impact on the availability of the application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an Open Redirect (CWE-601) vulnerability in BSP applications where user-controlled URL parameters are not validated before being used in redirect operations. An unauthenticated attacker can craft malicious URLs that redirect users to attacker-controlled websites, exploiting insufficient input validation on redirect logic.

MitigationImplement strict input validation with a whitelist approach for all redirect URLs, ensuring only trusted domains are allowed. Alternatively, use indirect redirects (e.g., internal mapping tokens) instead of allowing direct URL parameter injection for redirects.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Document Management SystemApplication
Affected:= 600= 602= 603= 604= 605= 606= 617
ErpApplication
Affected:= 618
S4coreApplication
Affected:= 102= 103= 104= 105= 106= 107= 108

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed SAP product and version
    Use transaction code SM37 or check system information via SAP GUI: execute 'System > Status' and note the SAP system version and release number. Alternatively, use ABAP report RSUSR200 to retrieve version details.
    Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: DMS = 600, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 617; ERP = 618; S4CORE = 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, or 108.
  2. Verify if BSP (Business Server Pages) applications are enabled
    Access SAP transaction code SE80 (Object Navigator) or use transaction SICF to check if BSP services are active. Look for BSP-related services under the '/sap/bc' path.
    Affected if BSP applications are active and accessible in the SAP system.
  3. Locate BSP applications with redirect functionality
    Search the BSP application codebase (using transaction SE80 or transaction code SE24 for class grep) for keywords: 'redirect', 'IF_HTTP_REQUEST~GET_HEADER', 'SET_LOCATION', or similar redirect methods. Review custom BSP applications that handle URL parameters.
    Affected if BSP applications exist that accept URL parameters and perform redirect operations using those parameters.
  4. Inspect redirect parameter handling for validation
    Review the code of identified BSP applications. Check if URL parameters used in redirect operations (such as 'url', 'redirect', 'target', or similar) are validated against a whitelist or if user-supplied values are used directly in redirect logic.
    Affected if Redirect parameters accept user input without proper validation against a whitelist of allowed domains, or if the application permits arbitrary external URLs in redirect parameters.

A user is affected if their SAP system runs an affected version, has BSP applications enabled, and contains BSP pages that use unvalidated URL parameters for redirect operations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation with a whitelist approach for all redirect URLs, ensuring only trusted domains are allowed. Alternatively, use indirect redirects (e.g., internal mapping tokens) instead of allowing direct URL parameter injection for redirects.

Fix this in Document Management System Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,820
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0505 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0505 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data