CVE-2026-0515
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsufficient Parameter Validation in the SchedGet() system call could allow an attacker with local access to cause a crash of the QNX Neutrino kernel.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe SchedGet() system call in QNX Neutrino RTOS lacks proper parameter validation. A local attacker can exploit this insufficiency by passing malformed parameters to the system call, triggering a kernel crash resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm QNX Neutrino RTOS is in useRun 'uname -a' or check system documentation to verify the operating system is QNX Neutrino RTOSAffected if The system is not running QNX Neutrino RTOS (this CVE does not apply)
-
Identify the QNX Neutrino RTOS versionRun 'uname -v' or check '/usr/qnx640/boot' directory for version files; compare against any available QNX version informationAffected if Unable to determine version or version falls within affected QNX Neutrino RTOS releases with unpatched SchedGet()
-
Verify SchedGet() system call accessibilityCheck if unprivileged local users can invoke the SchedGet() syscall by examining process permissions and syscall access controlsAffected if Unprivileged local users can call SchedGet() without restrictions
-
Audit kernel parameter handlingReview any kernel logs or crash dumps for prior incidents involving SchedGet() failures; check for existing parameter validation patchesAffected if No parameter validation is implemented for SchedGet() and prior crashes have occurred with malformed parameters
A user is affected if the system runs an unpatched version of QNX Neutrino RTOS where local unprivileged access to the SchedGet() system call is permitted and no parameter validation hardening is in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement robust parameter validation in the SchedGet() system call to ensure all input parameters are within acceptable bounds before processing. Restrict local access to privileged operations where possible.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0515 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0515 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data