CVE-2026-0583
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Online Product Reservation System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file app/user/login.php of the component User Login. The manipulation of the argument emailadd results in sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the User Login component of code-projects Online Product Reservation System 1.0. The emailadd parameter in app/user/login.php is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the application installation directorySearch for directories containing 'product-reservation', 'reservation', or 'Fabian' in your web server document root (commonly /var/www, /htdocs, or C:\inetpub\wwwroot).Affected if The Online Product Reservation System 1.0 is found installed on the server.
-
Verify the application versionCheck for a version file, README, or footer in the application. Common locations include a /includes, /config, or root-level version.txt, about.php, or version.php.Affected if The version is confirmed as 1.0.
-
Confirm vulnerable file existsVerify the presence of app/user/login.php within the application directory structure.Affected if The file app/user/login.php exists in the installation.
-
Inspect the emailadd parameter handlingOpen app/user/login.php in a text editor and locate the code handling the 'emailadd' parameter (typically within a $_POST or $_GET request). Look for whether the parameter is used directly in SQL queries or passed through sanitization functions.Affected if The emailadd parameter is used in SQL queries without prepared statements, parameter binding, or escaping functions (such as mysqli_real_escape_string, htmlspecialchars with ENT_QUOTES, or parameterized queries).
If the Online Product Reservation System version 1.0 is installed and app/user/login.php contains unsanitized use of the emailadd parameter in SQL queries, the environment is affected by CVE-2026-0583.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) in login.php to properly sanitize the emailadd parameter before executing database queries.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0583 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0583 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data