CVE-2026-0625
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple D-Link DSL/DIR/DNS devices contain an authentication bypass and improper access control vulnerability in the dnscfg.cgi endpoint that allows an unauthenticated attacker to access DNS configuration functionality. By directly requesting this endpoint, an attacker can modify the device’s DNS settings without valid credentials, enabling DNS hijacking (“DNSChanger”) attacks that redirect user traffic to attacker-controlled infrastructure. In 2019, D-Link reported that this behavior was leveraged by the "GhostDNS" malware ecosystem targeting consumer and carrier routers. All impacted products were subsequently designated end-of-life/end-of-service, and no longer receive security updates. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-11-27 (UTC).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceD-Link DSL/DIR/DNS devices contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the dnscfg.cgi endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to modify DNS settings, enabling DNS hijacking attacks that redirect traffic to malicious infrastructure. This was exploited by the GhostDNS malware ecosystem in 2019 and was observed in the wild by Shadowserver Foundation in November 2025.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your D-Link device modelCheck the device label or web interface for the model number (DSL, DIR, or DNS series)Affected if Device is a D-Link DSL, DIR, or DNS series router
-
Confirm dnscfg.cgi endpoint is exposedAttempt to access http://<device-ip>/dnscfg.cgi from an internal network hostAffected if Endpoint responds with any HTTP status (200, 401, or error page) rather than a connection failure
-
Test DNS configuration modification without authenticationSend a POST request to dnscfg.cgi with DNS parameters (such as dns_primary= and dns_secondary=) without providing any authentication cookies or credentialsAffected if Request succeeds and returns success response or modifies DNS settings without requiring login
-
Inspect current DNS server settingsAccess the device web interface or check DNS configuration via command: grep dns /etc/config/network or similar on the deviceAffected if Primary DNS server is set to an IP address you did not configure or is different from your ISP-assigned values
-
Verify remote management is enabledCheck device settings for 'Remote Management' or 'Web Access' enabled on WAN interface (typically under Administration > System or Management settings)Affected if Remote management is enabled and accessible from WAN on ports 80/443
You are affected if you use a D-Link DSL, DIR, or DNS series device where dnscfg.cgi allows unauthenticated DNS configuration changes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDevices are end-of-life with no security updates available; affected devices should be replaced with supported hardware. Network-level DNS filtering and monitoring can provide interim protection.
- Isolate affected D-Link devices on a restricted VLAN or behind a firewall to limit external network exposure
- Disable remote web management if not required - access the router's administration interface and turn off "Remote Management" or "Web Access" from WAN
- Implement network segmentation to place the affected device in a DMZ or isolated network segment
- Monitor network traffic for suspicious DNS configuration changes using intrusion detection systems
- Consider replacing EOL D-Link devices with currently supported hardware from vendors that provide regular security updates
- If the device must remain in service, configure upstream network equipment to block external access to the device's WAN IP on ports 80/443
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0625 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0625 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data