CVE-2026-0665
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn off-by-one error was found in QEMU's KVM Xen guest support. A malicious guest could use this flaw to trigger out-of-bounds heap accesses in the QEMU process via the emulated Xen physdev hypercall interface, leading to a denial of service or potential memory corruption.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn off-by-one error in QEMU's KVM Xen guest support allows a malicious guest to trigger out-of-bounds heap accesses via the emulated Xen physdev hypercall interface, potentially causing denial of service or memory corruption in the QEMU host process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed QEMU versionRun 'qemu-system-x86_64 --version' or 'qemu-img --version' to determine the QEMU version installed on the hostAffected if The installed version falls within the vulnerable range (prior to the patch for this off-by-one error in Xen physdev hypercall emulation)
-
Confirm KVM kernel module is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep kvm' and check for 'kvm_intel' or 'kvm_amd' modules to verify KVM is activeAffected if KVM is loaded and available, creating the condition for this vulnerability to be exploitable
-
Check for active Xen guests running under KVMRun 'xl list' or 'virsh list --all' to enumerate running virtual machines and identify any that are Xen-basedAffected if Any Xen virtual machines are running under QEMU/KVM, meaning the vulnerable Xen physdev hypercall interface is in use
-
Verify QEMU is configured with Xen supportCheck QEMU build configuration by running 'qemu-system-x86_64 -help' 2>&1 | grep -i xen, or review the QEMU binary for xen capability: 'strings $(which qemu-system-x86_64) | grep -i xen'Affected if QEMU is built with Xen support enabled, which is required for the vulnerable code path to be present
-
Inspect running QEMU processes with Xen guest parametersRun 'ps aux | grep qemu' to identify any qemu-system-x86_64 processes with Xen-related parameters such as '- xen-domid' or '- device xen-backend'Affected if A QEMU process is actively handling a Xen guest, meaning the vulnerable physdev hypercall emulation code is in use
A host is affected if it runs a vulnerable QEMU version with KVM enabled and is actively executing Xen guests, which causes the Xen physdev hypercall interface to be invoked.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate QEMU to the patched version that fixes the off-by-one error in the Xen physdev hypercall emulation. If running Xen guests under KVM, ensure QEMU is updated and test the physdev interface for regressions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0665 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0665 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data