LangflowApplication

CVE-2026-0769

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2026-01-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Langflow eval_custom_component_code Eval Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Langflow. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of eval_custom_component_code function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute python code. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-26972.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Langflow contains a code injection vulnerability in the eval_custom_component_code function. The application evaluates user-supplied input directly through Python's eval() without sanitization, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Python code in the context of the server process.

MitigationRestrict network exposure of Langflow and implement proper input validation before evaluating code, or replace the eval() approach with safer alternatives such as restricted execution environments, sandboxing, or AST-based validation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LangflowApplication
Affected:= 1.3.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Langflow version
    Run 'pip show langflow' or check the package version in your environment. If using Docker, check the image tag or inspect the container metadata.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.3.2 (the affected version)
  2. Locate eval_custom_component_code function
    Search the Langflow codebase (typically in a Python package) for the function named 'eval_custom_component_code'. Check files under the langflow/ directory for function definitions containing 'eval('.
    Affected if The function exists and uses Python's eval() on user input without sanitization
  3. Verify unauthenticated access to the vulnerable function
    Examine the authentication/authorization configuration around the eval_custom_component_code endpoint. Check if the API route or function is accessible without authentication (no login token required).
    Affected if The function is exposed without requiring authentication
  4. Check network exposure of Langflow service
    Determine if the Langflow service is listening on a network interface accessible from outside (0.0.0.0 or public IP) versus localhost only. Check service configuration or running process bind address.
    Affected if Langflow is exposed to untrusted networks (not restricted to localhost or VPN)

You are affected if you run Langflow version 1.3.2 AND the eval_custom_component_code function is accessible without authentication on a network-exposed instance.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict network exposure of Langflow and implement proper input validation before evaluating code, or replace the eval() approach with safer alternatives such as restricted execution environments, sandboxing, or AST-based validation.

Fix this in Langflow Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
26.0 hours of engineering $4,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0769 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0769 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data