CVE-2026-0787
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedALGO 8180 IP Audio Alerter SAC Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of ALGO 8180 IP Audio Alerter devices. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the SAC module. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-28296.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe ALGO 8180 IP Audio Alerter contains a command injection vulnerability in its SAC module. The device fails to properly validate user-supplied input before passing it to a system call, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of the device. This is a pre-authentication RCE with CVSS 9.8, making it remotely exploitable without any credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the device model is Algo 8180 IP Audio AlerterCheck the device label, web interface, or SNMP inventory for the model number 8180. Access the device web panel if available and look for the model identification.Affected if The device is not an Algo 8180 IP Audio Alerter, then this specific CVE does not apply.
-
Identify the installed firmware versionAccess the device web interface and navigate to the firmware or system information page to view the running firmware version. Alternatively, check via SNMP or the device's API if accessible.Affected if The firmware version is exactly 5.5, indicating this specific vulnerable version is installed.
-
Verify the SAC module is present and accessibleCheck if the SAC (Station Alert Control) module endpoint is available on the device by attempting to access the SAC-related URL path or checking the device configuration for SAC module status.Affected if The SAC module is enabled and exposed, making the command injection flaw accessible without authentication.
-
Assess network exposure of the deviceReview firewall rules and network segmentation to determine if the device management interface is reachable from untrusted or external networks. Check for direct internet exposure or accessibility from less-trusted network segments.Affected if The device is reachable from untrusted networks without network segmentation or filtering, enabling remote exploitation.
You are affected if the device is an Algo 8180 IP Audio Alerter running firmware version 5.5 with the SAC module accessible on an exposed network interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIsolate the device on a restricted network segment, implement firewall rules to limit exposure to only trusted management sources, and monitor for unauthorized access attempts. Contact the vendor for firmware updates to address the command injection flaw.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0787 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0787 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data