CVE-2026-0967
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in libssh. A remote attacker, by controlling client configuration files or known_hosts files, could craft specific hostnames that when processed by the `match_pattern()` function can lead to inefficient regular expression backtracking. This can cause timeouts and resource exhaustion, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the client.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencelibssh contains a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability in the match_pattern() function. A remote attacker who can control client configuration files or known_hosts files can craft specific hostnames that trigger inefficient regex backtracking, causing excessive CPU consumption, timeouts, and resource exhaustion on the client.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 10.0<= 0.11.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed libssh versionRun 'rpm -q libssh' on RHEL systems, or 'ssh -V' / check library version with 'ldd' or package manager on other systemsAffected if The installed version is libssh <= 0.11.3, or the system is RHEL 9.0 or RHEL 10.0 with libssh installed
-
Locate client configuration filesCheck for the presence of ~/.ssh/config and ~/.ssh/known_hosts files in user home directoriesAffected if These files exist and are used by the SSH client for host pattern matching
-
Check file permissions and sourcesInspect file ownership and permissions of ~/.ssh/config and ~/.ssh/known_hosts using 'ls -la ~/.ssh/'Affected if Files are writable by untrusted users or were imported from untrusted sources
-
Verify pattern matching usageReview SSH config files for Host or Match directives that use pattern matching against hostnamesAffected if Pattern matching directives are present in client configuration files
-
Assess risk from untrusted sourcesDetermine if known_hosts or config files could contain entries from untrusted or compromised serversAffected if The system has ever connected to untrusted hosts or imported known_hosts from external sources
A user is affected if they have libssh version 0.11.3 or earlier (or are on RHEL 9.0/10.0 with libssh installed) AND use client configuration files or known_hosts that could contain attacker-controlled hostnames with regex patterns triggering inefficient backtracking.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedAvoid using client configuration files or known_hosts files from untrusted sources. Update libssh to the latest version once a patch is available. Consider implementing timeout limits on pattern matching operations as a defense-in-depth measure.
libssh > 0.11.3 (check Red Hat errata for exact fixed version)
- Run `dnf check-update libssh` or `yum update libssh` to check for available security updates
- If an update is available, run `dnf update libssh` or `yum update libssh` to apply the fix
- Alternatively, verify the current version with `rpm -q libssh` and confirm it is newer than 0.11.3 after updating
- Restart any SSH services or applications using libssh to ensure the patched library is loaded
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0967 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0967 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data