CVE-2026-10046
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBitdefender Napoca bare-metal hypervisor contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the BIOS INT 0x15 / E820 memory map handler, implemented in napoca/guests/bios_handlers.c. The handler computes a destination offset into the guest RealModeMemory buffer from guest-controlled ES and EDI register values without validating that the resulting address remains within the 1MB RealModeMemory allocation. A malicious guest operating in real mode can trigger the issue by invoking INT 0x15 with AX=0xE820, EDX=0x534D4150, ECX greater than or equal to 20, EBX=0, ES=0xFFFF, and EDI=0xFFFF. This can cause a write of up to 20 bytes past the end of the RealModeMemory buffer into the hypervisor heap. The product is end-of-life and unsupported when assigned.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Bitdefender Napoca hypervisor has an out-of-bounds write in its BIOS INT 0x15 E820 memory map handler (napoca/guests/bios_handlers.c). The handler computes a destination offset using guest-controlled ES and EDI registers without validating the address stays within the 1MB RealModeMemory buffer. A malicious real-mode guest can trigger this by setting ES=0xFFFF and EDI=0xFFFF with specific values in other registers, writing up to 20 bytes past the buffer into hypervisor heap memory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if Bitdefender Napoca hypervisor is installedCheck for Napoca hypervisor installation by looking for its executable or service: on Windows, check Program Files for 'Napoca' folder or run 'sc query' for Napoca services; on Linux, check /opt or /usr/lib for napoca componentsAffected if Napoca hypervisor software is present on the system
-
Identify Napoca hypervisor processesRun process enumeration (tasklist on Windows, ps aux on Linux) and look for napoca-related processes such as napoca.exe, napoca-hypervisor, or similarAffected if Any Napoca hypervisor process is running
-
Check for active virtual machines using E820Review running VM configurations to determine if guests that utilize BIOS E820 memory map queries are active. Any VM that boots and queries system memory map will trigger the vulnerable handlerAffected if Any virtual machine is running on the Napoca hypervisor
-
Confirm hypervisor handles real-mode memory queriesThe E820 handler is invoked when a guest queries BIOS memory map information. This occurs during VM boot for most guest operating systems. No special configuration needed - it's a default BIOS behaviorAffected if The Napoca hypervisor is running any guest that performs memory map queries (standard BIOS behavior)
-
Review guest execution policiesAudit VM configurations to determine if untrusted or potentially malicious real-mode code could execute within guestsAffected if Untrusted or unverified VMs are permitted to run on the Napoca hypervisor
If Bitdefender Napoca hypervisor is installed and running any virtual machines, the environment is affected since all versions contain the out-of-bounds write in the E820 memory map handler and no patch is available.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataThis vulnerability has no remediation as the product is end-of-life and unsupported. Organizations should remove any deployments of Bitdefender Napoca and migrate to a supported hypervisor solution.
- Consultation2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10046 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10046 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data