CVE-2026-10067
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in Shibby Tomato 1.28. Impacted is the function sub_90F0 of the file multimon.cgi. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. This project is superseded by FreshTomato. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the sub_90F0 function of multimon.cgi in Shibby Tomato 1.28 firmware, allowing remote exploitation via crafted input to the web interface component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router firmware versionAccess the router's web administrative interface and look for the firmware version in the status or administration page, or run 'cat /proc/version' or 'uname -a' via SSH/telnet if availableAffected if The firmware shows Shibby Tomato version 1.28 exactly
-
Confirm the firmware is Shibby Tomato (not FreshTomato)Check the firmware name/version string in the router's status page or via 'nvram get tomatowebversion' or 'nvram get os_version' commandAffected if The firmware identifies as Shibby Tomato rather than FreshTomato
-
Check if multimon.cgi is accessibleAttempt to access the multimon.cgi script via HTTP/HTTPS request to the router (e.g., http://router-ip/cgi-bin/multimon.cgi)Affected if The CGI script responds or is reachable on the network
-
Verify multimon functionality is enabledCheck router configuration for multimon settings, or look for multimon-related entries in the NVRAM variables via 'nvram show | grep multimon'Affected if Multimon feature or module is enabled on the device
A user is affected if the router runs Shibby Tomato 1.28 firmware with the multimon.cgi feature accessible and enabled on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataMigrate to FreshTomato (the supported successor project) or replace affected hardware with currently supported equipment, as Shibby Tomato 1.28 is no longer maintained.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10067 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10067 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data