CVE-2026-10089
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Insert Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via post custom field keys (meta key names) in all versions up to, and including, 3.11.4. This is due to insufficient output escaping in the the_meta() function: while the custom field VALUE is sanitized with wp_kses_post(), the custom field KEY ($key) is interpolated into the rendered HTML (lines 1786-1791) and echoed (line 1806) without any escaping when an inserted page is rendered with the [insert page='ID' display='all'] shortcode. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Insert Pages WordPress plugin (versions up to 3.11.4) contains a stored XSS vulnerability in its the_meta() function. While custom field VALUES are properly sanitized with wp_kses_post(), the custom field KEYS are directly interpolated into HTML output without any escaping (lines 1786-1791, echoed line 1806). Authenticated attackers with author-level access can inject malicious scripts via custom field meta key names that execute whenever users access pages containing the [insert page='ID' display='all'] shortcode.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Insert Pages plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Insert Pages' in the list. Note whether it is active or inactive.Affected if The plugin is installed and active - the vulnerability only applies when the plugin is active.
-
Check Insert Pages plugin versionClick 'View details' on the Insert Pages plugin in the plugins list, or check the main plugin file (insert-pages/insert-pages.php) for the 'Version' header comment. Compare against the affected range: versions 3.11.4 and earlier are vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is 3.11.4 or earlier.
-
Identify custom field keys in the databaseQuery the wp_postmeta table (or use a plugin like WP Data Access) to examine meta_key values in the database. Look for custom field keys that may contain HTML/script tags or unusual characters that could indicate malicious input.Affected if Any custom field keys contain unescaped HTML or script tags that would execute when rendered by the_meta().
-
Locate pages using the vulnerable shortcodeSearch the wp_posts table for content containing the shortcode pattern [insert_page display='all']. The vulnerability triggers when this specific shortcode variant is used.Affected if Any published content contains the [insert_page='ID' display='all'] shortcode, which invokes the vulnerable the_meta() function.
-
Confirm the_meta function is called by the shortcodeExamine the Insert Pages plugin file around lines 1786-1806 (the the_meta() function) to verify that when display='all' is used, the meta keys are output without escaping. Check if your content triggers this code path.Affected if The plugin code shows meta keys are directly output without esc_attr() or similar escaping, and your content uses the vulnerable shortcode.
A user is affected if the Insert Pages plugin version is 3.11.4 or earlier, the plugin is active, and content exists using the [insert_page display='all'] shortcode that renders custom field meta keys.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the Insert Pages plugin to version 3.11.5 or later which applies esc_attr() or equivalent escaping to meta key names before output. As an interim measure, restrict custom field creation/editing to trusted administrators only.
3.11.5
- Update the Insert Pages WordPress plugin to version 3.11.5 or later
- Verify the update was successful by checking the Plugins page in WordPress admin
- Test that the [insert page] shortcode still functions correctly after the update
- Confirm that custom field keys are now properly escaped when rendered
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10089 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10089 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data