CVE-2026-10161
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in TRENDnet TEW-432BRP 3.10B20. This affects the function formResetStatistic of the file /goform/formResetStatistic. Performing a manipulation of the argument status_statistic results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor explains: "This product has been EOL for 15 years (since 2009). As the item has been EOL for such a long time, we are not able to replicate or fix any vulnerabilities." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in TRENDnet TEW-432BRP web interface function formResetStatistic, triggered by manipulating the status_statistic parameter. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to overflow a stack buffer via the /goform/formResetStatistic endpoint, potentially leading to code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is TRENDnet TEW-432BRPAccess the device web interface or check the device label/marketing materials to verify the exact model numberAffected if The device is not a TRENDnet TEW-432BRP model - different models are not affected
-
Check if the web interface is accessibleAttempt to access the device web interface at the default IP (typically 192.168.10.1) via HTTPAffected if The web interface is exposed and reachable on the network - the vulnerability requires HTTP access to the /goform/formResetStatistic handler
-
Identify the firmware versionLog into the web interface and navigate to the system status or firmware upgrade page to find the installed firmware version, or check via telnet/SSH if availableAffected if The installed firmware version falls within any affected version range (compare your version to the vendor release notes for this specific model)
-
Verify the vulnerable handler existsSend an HTTP GET or POST request to /goform/formResetStatistic and observe if the endpoint respondsAffected if The /goform/formResetStatistic endpoint is present and responds - this confirms the vulnerable handler is enabled on the device
You are affected if you have a TRENDnet TEW-432BRP device with its web interface accessible and the /goform/formResetStatistic endpoint is present and responsive.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince the device is EOL with no vendor patch available, the primary mitigation is replacing the device with a currently supported model. If immediate replacement is not feasible, network isolation or disabling the affected web interface may reduce exposure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10161 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10161 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data