CVE-2026-10194
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in OFFIS DCMTK 3.7.0. This affects the function DcmQueryRetrieveIndexDatabaseHandle::deleteOldestImages of the file dcmqrdb/libsrc/dcmqrdbi.cc of the component dcmqrscp. Executing a manipulation can lead to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. This patch is called 0f78a4ef6f645ea5530166e445e5436a5de58e75. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in the deleteOldestImages function of dcmqrscp (DICOM query/retrieve service class provider) in DCMTK 3.7.0. The vulnerability exists in dcmqrdb/libsrc/dcmqrdbi.cc and can be exploited remotely to potentially execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service through memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify DCMTK installation and versionRun 'dcmqrscp -v' or 'dcmtk-version' to get the DCMTK version. Alternatively, check package manager for installed DCMTK packages.Affected if The installed version is DCMTK 3.7.0 (exact match to affected version). Versions prior to the patch commit are also likely affected.
-
Locate the dcmqrscp binaryRun 'which dcmqrscp' or search for the binary in common paths like /usr/bin/dcmqrscp or /usr/local/bin/dcmqrscp.Affected if The dcmqrscp binary exists on the system, indicating the vulnerable component is present.
-
Verify if query/retrieve service is configured or runningCheck running processes for 'dcmqrscp' via 'ps aux | grep dcmqrscp' and check for configuration files (often named dcmqrscp.cfg) in /etc, /usr/local/etc, or application directories.Affected if The dcmqrscp service is actively running or configured to run, enabling the vulnerable code path.
-
Inspect DICOM query/retrieve service configurationExamine the dcmqrscp configuration file for enabled storage areas and query/retrieve AE titles. Check if network listeners are bound to accessible interfaces.Affected if The query/retrieve service is bound to network interfaces and accepts external connections, exposing the vulnerability to remote attackers.
A system is affected if it runs DCMTK version 3.7.0 with the dcmqrscp query/retrieve service enabled and exposed to network traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply patch commit 0f78a4ef6f645ea5530166e445e5436a5de58e75 to fix the buffer overflow in DcmQueryRetrieveIndexDatabaseHandle::deleteOldestImages; ensure input validation and bounds checking are enforced.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10194 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10194 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data