CVE-2026-10208
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in code-projects Online Hospital Management System 1.php. This impacts the function login_user of the file login_1.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument Username can lead to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the login_user function of login_1.php in code-projects Online Hospital Management System. The Username parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing attackers to manipulate SQL queries through the login form.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the login_1.php fileSearch the web server document root for the file login_1.php, typically found in the application root or admin directory of the Online Hospital Management SystemAffected if The file exists and is part of a deployed code-projects Hospital Management System
-
Identify the login_user functionOpen login_1.php and search for the function definition 'function login_user' or 'function login' within the fileAffected if The login_user function is defined in login_1.php
-
Examine the Username parameter handlingWithin the login_user function, locate where the Username POST or GET parameter is used in SQL queries - look for variables like $username or $_POST['username'] directly concatenated into SQL stringsAffected if The Username parameter is concatenated directly into SQL queries without apparent sanitization or use of prepared statements
-
Verify database query constructionReview the SQL query strings in the login_user function - check if they use single quotes, string concatenation, or direct variable insertion around the username inputAffected if SQL queries are built using string concatenation or interpolation with user input rather than parameterized queries
-
Confirm remote accessibilityCheck if the login_1.php page is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS from the network - verify the web server serves this file on the configured portAffected if The login page is reachable remotely and accepts user input via the Username field
If the Online Hospital Management System is deployed with login_1.php containing a login_user function that uses the Username parameter directly in SQL queries without prepared statements, the system is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the login_user function to neutralize SQL injection vectors.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10208 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10208 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data