CVE-2026-10250
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Online Blood Bank Management System 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /admin/campsdetails.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument hospital results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the hospital parameter of /admin/campsdetails.php in itsourcecode Online Blood Bank Management System v1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate SQL queries via unsanitized input. A public exploit exists, indicating active risk.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the blood bank management system is installedCheck your web server for the presence of the 'itsourcecode' Online Blood Bank Management System by searching for typical installation paths (e.g., /var/www/html/, C:\xampp\htdocs\, or similar web root directories). Look for files like campsdetails.php or admin panel pages.Affected if The itsourcecode Online Blood Bank Management System version 1.0 is installed on the server.
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileSearch for the file campsdetails.php in your web directory, typically under an /admin/ subdirectory. Verify the file exists: find /path/to/webroot -name 'campsdetails.php' (Linux) or search in your web folder (Windows).Affected if The file /admin/campsdetails.php exists in the web application directory.
-
Inspect the hospital parameter handlingOpen campsdetails.php and examine how the 'hospital' parameter is processed. Look for SQL queries that directly incorporate the parameter without using prepared statements or parameter binding. Search for patterns like $_GET['hospital'] or $_POST['hospital'] used in SQL strings.Affected if The code directly includes the 'hospital' parameter in SQL queries without sanitization or prepared statements.
-
Verify admin panel accessibilityCheck if the /admin/ endpoint is publicly accessible. Attempt to access the admin login page and verify whether authentication is required or if the campsdetails.php endpoint can be reached.Affected if The admin interface at /admin/campsdetails.php is accessible without proper access controls.
Your environment is affected if the itsourcecode Online Blood Bank Management System 1.0 is installed and the /admin/campsdetails.php file uses the 'hospital' parameter in unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries in campsdetails.php with parameterized queries/prepared statements, apply input validation on the hospital parameter, and implement least-privilege database access. Consider a WAF as an interim control.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10250 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10250 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data