CVE-2026-10254
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in SourceCodester Pet Grooming Management Software 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/. This manipulation causes file and directory information exposure. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSourceCodester Pet Grooming Management Software 1.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the /admin/ directory that exposes file and directory structure information. The specific vulnerable function is not identified in available documentation. This vulnerability is remotely exploitable and may allow attackers to gather reconnaissance information about the application structure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Pet Grooming Management Software installationIdentify if SourceCodester Pet Grooming Management Software 1.0 is deployed on the server by checking for known files such as index.php in the root directory, or by reviewing application startup pages for the product name and version string.Affected if The software is installed and running.
-
Test /admin/ path accessibilitySend an HTTP GET request to http://[target]/admin/ and examine the response. Look for a directory listing that displays file names, directory contents, or a default web server index page.Affected if The /admin/ directory is accessible and returns a directory listing showing file or folder names.
-
Verify directory listing is enabledInspect the HTTP response body for patterns such as 'Index of /admin/', 'Directory listing for', file extension lists (e.g., .php, .txt, .config), or parent directory links (..). This indicates directory indexing is active.Affected if The response displays a list of files or directories within /admin/ rather than redirecting to a login page or returning a 403 error.
-
Check web server directory listing configurationFor Apache: examine .htaccess files in the /admin/ directory or parent directories for 'Options +Indexes' or absence of 'Options -Indexes'. For IIS: review web.config files for directoryListing enabled attribute.Affected if Directory listing is explicitly enabled in the web server configuration or not explicitly disabled.
-
Confirm authentication is required for /admin/Attempt to access known sensitive files within /admin/ (e.g., /admin/config.php, /admin/functions.php) without credentials. Check if the server returns a login form, redirects to an authentication page, or returns HTTP 401/403 without proper session cookies.Affected if The /admin/ directory or its contents are accessible without any authentication challenge.
A user is affected if the /admin/ directory of Pet Grooming Management Software 1.0 is publicly accessible and displays a directory listing without requiring authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper access controls and disable directory listing on the web server configuration for the /admin/ path. Review and secure the unknown vulnerable function to prevent unauthorized disclosure of file system information.
- Disable directory listing on the web server for the /admin/ directory (e.g., in Apache add 'Options -Indexes' in .htaccess or server config).
- Ensure that the /admin/ area requires authentication; enforce login or HTTP Basic Auth and restrict access to trusted users.
- If the application provides role‑based access control, verify that all admin functions are behind proper authorization checks.
- Consider restricting access to /admin/ by IP address or using a VPN if feasible.
- Monitor for any unusual access attempts and keep the application updated if a patched version becomes available.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10254 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10254 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data