CVE-2026-10263
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Computer Repair Shop Management System up to 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/products/manage_product.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Computer Repair Shop Management System (version 1.0 and below) in the /admin/products/manage_product.php file. The ID parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the argument. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable and public exploits exist.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm SourceCodester Computer Repair Shop Management System is installedLocate the web application directory (commonly in htdocs, www, or public_html) and check for the application's index file or characteristic folder structureAffected if The application directory contains SourceCodester Computer Repair Shop Management System files
-
Determine the installed versionCheck for a version file, README, or the main index.php for a version number, or look in the application root for version informationAffected if The version is 1.0 or lower (including any unlabeled versions predating 1.0)
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsCheck for the presence of /admin/products/manage_product.php in the web application directoryAffected if The file manage_product.php exists in the /admin/products/ directory
-
Check if the admin panel is accessibleAttempt to access the /admin/ endpoint or check if the admin login page is reachable without authentication restrictionsAffected if The /admin/products/manage_product.php endpoint is accessible (with or without authentication)
-
Verify the ID parameter is acceptedExamine the manage_product.php code to confirm it accepts an 'id' GET or POST parameter and uses it in SQL queries without sanitizationAffected if The code retrieves an 'id' parameter and incorporates it directly into SQL queries without prepared statements or escaping
A user is affected if they have SourceCodester Computer Repair Shop Management System version 1.0 or lower with the file /admin/products/manage_product.php present and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with prepared statements/parameterized queries. Additionally, implement input validation on all user-supplied parameters and apply the principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10263 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10263 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data