CVE-2026-10302
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in itsourcecode Fees Management System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /manage_fee.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument ID can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Fees Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate the ID parameter in /manage_fee.php to inject malicious SQL queries. The lack of input sanitization or parameterized queries in the affected file permits database manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the application installationSearch the web server document root for the itsourcecode Fees Management System directory structure, specifically looking for manage_fee.phpAffected if The application files are found on the server
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsConfirm the presence of /manage_fee.php in the web application directoryAffected if The file /manage_fee.php exists in the application path
-
Identify the application versionCheck for version indicators such as version files, headers, or footer content in the application that indicate the exact version (e.g., 1.0)Affected if The installed version is 1.0 or cannot be determined to be a later version
-
Confirm ID parameter acceptanceExamine the manage_fee.php code or test the endpoint by sending a request with an ID parameter to /manage_fee.phpAffected if The application accepts an ID parameter without visible sanitization in the code or response
-
Check for SQL injection vulnerabilityReview the manage_fee.php source code for direct use of the ID parameter in SQL queries without prepared statements, parameterized queries, or input sanitization functionsAffected if The ID parameter is used in SQL queries without parameterized query implementation
The environment is affected if itsourcecode Fees Management System version 1.0 is installed and the manage_fee.php file processes the ID parameter in SQL queries without prepared statements or input sanitization
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with prepared statements/parameterized queries in manage_fee.php, implement strict input validation for the ID parameter, and apply principle of least privilege to the database user.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10302 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10302 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data