CVE-2026-10510
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Scripting (XSS) in GeniexWebView component in Transsion AI Assistant Lifestyle application (com.transsion.aiassistantlifestyle) all versions on Android allows remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the WebView context via crafted web_action_data URL parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the GeniexWebView component of the Transsion AI Assistant Lifestyle Android application. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of the web_action_data URL parameter, which allows a remote attacker to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript code within the WebView context. This enables session hijacking, credential theft, or manipulation of the WebView content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Transsion AI Assistant Lifestyle app is installedCheck installed applications on the Android device for 'Transsion AI Assistant Lifestyle' or related package nameAffected if The application is present on the device
-
Determine the installed application versionUse package manager or app settings to retrieve the version information of the Transsion AI Assistant Lifestyle appAffected if Version cannot be determined or falls within an affected version range
-
Verify GeniexWebView component presenceInspect the application APK or decompiled code for the GeniexWebView component classAffected if GeniexWebView component is found in the application
-
Inspect web_action_data parameter handlingAnalyze code that handles the web_action_data URL parameter within the WebView implementationAffected if The parameter is used without proper sanitization or encoding before loading into WebView
-
Check WebView security configurationReview WebView settings in the application for JavaScript enablement and content access settingsAffected if JavaScript is enabled and user-controlled data can be rendered without escaping
A user is affected if the Transsion AI Assistant Lifestyle app with a vulnerable GeniexWebView component that processes web_action_data without sanitization is installed on their device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization on the web_action_data parameter before passing it to the WebView, and configure the WebView to disable JavaScript execution unless explicitly required with proper context isolation and allowlist-based URL validation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10510 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10510 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data