CVE-2026-10544
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper neutralization of special elements in the built-in PAM provider password rotation templates in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated user with write access to a vault to execute arbitrary commands on the systems managed by the affected PAM provider. This issue affects : * Devolutions Server 2026.2.4.0 * Devolutions Server 2026.1.20.0 and earlier
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper neutralization of special elements in Devolutions Server's built-in PAM provider password rotation templates allows command injection. An authenticated user with vault write access can execute arbitrary commands on systems managed by the affected PAM provider through maliciously crafted password rotation templates.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.1.21.0= 2026.2.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Devolutions Server versionLocate the installed Devolutions Server instance and retrieve its version number through the administration console, about page, or installed software inventoryAffected if The installed version is lower than 2026.1.21.0 or exactly equals 2026.2.4.0
-
Confirm PAM provider is in useCheck if the built-in PAM provider module is enabled or configured in the Devolutions Server administration interface under PAM or privileged access management settingsAffected if PAM provider is enabled and password rotation templates are configured
-
Review password rotation template configurationsExamine the password rotation templates within the PAM provider settings for any custom scripts or command execution definitionsAffected if Custom password rotation templates exist that execute system commands or scripts during credential rotation
-
Audit vault write access permissionsReview user and group permissions on vaults to identify accounts with write access to the PAM-managed vault entriesAffected if Any user account has write access to vaults containing PAM provider credentials
-
Inspect for recent authentication and command execution logsReview Devolutions Server logs for suspicious command execution events originating from PAM password rotation operationsAffected if Unexpected or unauthorized command executions appear in logs associated with password rotation activities
You are affected if running Devolutions Server version 2026.1.x below 2026.1.21.0 or exactly 2026.2.4.0, with the PAM provider password rotation feature enabled and configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.1.21.0
Apply vendor-supplied patch for Devolutions Server. Restrict vault write access to trusted administrators only until patch is applied.
Devolutions Server 2026.1.21.0 or later (2026.2.5.0+)
- Identify your current Devolutions Server version by checking the About section in the application or using the Administration module
- Download Devolutions Server version 2026.1.21.0 or later from the official Devolutions download portal
- Review the upgrade documentation and release notes for any specific upgrade requirements
- Perform a backup of your Devolutions Server database and configuration before upgrading
- Execute the upgrade installer on the Devolutions Server instance
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number in the Administration module
- Test PAM provider functionality, particularly password rotation templates, to confirm the vulnerability is remediated
- Review audit logs to ensure no unauthorized command execution occurred prior to the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10544 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10544 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data