CVE-2026-10570
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Sympl Repeater for ACF and Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via ACF repeater field values in all versions up to, and including, 2.3. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping in the symp_arfe_replace_content() function, which uses str_replace() to substitute raw ACF field values (retrieved via get_field()) directly into Elementor-rendered HTML without any escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Sympl Repeater for ACF and Elementor WordPress plugin (versions up to 2.3) contains a stored XSS vulnerability in the symp_arfe_replace_content() function. This function retrieves ACF field values via get_field() and uses str_replace() to insert them directly into Elementor-rendered HTML without any sanitization or escaping. Authenticated users with Author-level or higher permissions can inject malicious JavaScript into ACF repeater field values that will execute when other users access the affected pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installationIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Sympl Repeater for ACF and Elementor' in the listAffected if The plugin is not installed or has been removed entirely
-
Check plugin versionOn the Plugins page, click on the plugin to view its details, or check the plugin's main PHP file header for the Version constant. Compare against the affected range (versions up to 2.3)Affected if Installed version is 2.3 or below
-
Verify plugin is activeOn the Plugins > Installed Plugins page, check if the plugin shows as 'Active'Affected if Plugin is active and running on the site
-
Identify ACF repeater field usageCheck if ACF (Advanced Custom Fields) with repeater field types is installed and being used alongside the Sympl Repeater plugin. Review page/post content that uses Elementor with ACF repeater fieldsAffected if ACF repeater fields are in use with Elementor pages and the vulnerable function symp_arfe_replace_content() is being called
-
Audit ACF repeater field values for malicious scriptsAccess the WordPress admin and review ACF repeater field values in posts/pages. Look for suspicious script tags, event handlers (onclick, onerror, etc.), or encoded JavaScript in field contentsAffected if Any ACF repeater field values contain unsanitized HTML or script tags that could execute when the page is viewed
You are affected if the Sympl Repeater for ACF and Elementor plugin is installed, active, and running version 2.3 or below while ACF repeater fields are being used with Elementor pages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the plugin to version 2.4 or later once available, or disable the plugin until a security patch is released. Audit existing pages using ACF repeater fields to identify and remove any malicious script injections.
latest available version ( newer than 2.3 )
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find the Sympl Repeater for ACF and Elementor plugin
- Check if an update is available and update to the latest version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10570 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10570 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data