CVE-2026-10597
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOMICARD EDM developed by ITPison has a Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to modify a specific parameter to obtain user's email address.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOMICARD EDM by ITPison contains an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve user email addresses by manipulating a specific parameter in requests. The CVSS 5.3 reflects the low-confidentiality impact of exposed PII without authentication requirements.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if OMICARD EDM is deployedCheck your application inventory or web server logs for the presence of OMICARD EDM software. Look for its web interface or administrative console in your environment.Affected if OMICARD EDM is installed in your environment
-
Locate the application endpointIdentify the base URL/web path where OMICARD EDM is accessible. This is typically found in your web server configuration or reverse proxy settings.Affected if OMICARD EDM responds to HTTP requests on a known endpoint
-
Test unauthenticated access to user data endpointsSend a crafted HTTP request to potential user data endpoints, such as those containing parameters like userId, id, or email, without providing authentication credentials. Observe if the response returns email address information.Affected if The application returns email addresses without requiring authentication or authorization validation
-
Verify parameter manipulation vulnerabilityModify the value of request parameters (such as user ID, customer ID, or record ID) in the HTTP request to reference different users. Compare if changing these values allows retrieval of other users' email addresses.Affected if Changing the parameter value to another user's identifier returns that user's email address without proper authorization checks
-
Check for proper authorization validationReview application logs or conduct repeated tests with different parameter values to confirm whether the application validates that the requesting user has permission to access the requested email address data.Affected if The application does not validate user authorization before returning email address data
Your environment is affected if OMICARD EDM is running and allows unauthenticated retrieval of email addresses by manipulating request parameters to reference other users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks to verify the requesting user has permission to access the requested data, and validate that all object references belong to the authenticated user before returning sensitive information.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10597 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10597 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data