CVE-2026-10670
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe CONFIG_USERSPACE verification handler for the k_thread_name_copy() system call (z_vrfy_k_thread_name_copy() in kernel/thread.c) calls k_object_find() on the caller-supplied thread pointer and then dereferences the returned struct k_object without checking it for NULL. k_object_find() returns NULL whenever the supplied pointer is not a registered (static or dynamic) kernel object. The pre-fix guard tested thread == NULL instead of ko == NULL, so an unprivileged user-mode thread that invokes k_thread_name_copy() with any non-NULL but unregistered pointer (e.g. an arbitrary address) passes the NULL test, after which the verifier reads ko->type through a NULL pointer. Because the syscall verifier runs in supervisor mode, this NULL dereference is a kernel-mode fault that halts or reboots the system, allowing untrusted user code to crash the kernel across the userspace security boundary (denial of service). The marshaller passes the thread argument to the verifier without any prior K_SYSCALL_OBJ validation, so the bad pointer reaches the defect directly. The flaw affects builds with CONFIG_USERSPACE and CONFIG_THREAD_NAME enabled and has been present since the special-case lookup was introduced around v2.0.0; it is present in v4.4.0 and earlier. The fix changes the guard to check the k_object_find() return value (ko == NULL) before dereferencing it.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Zephyr RTOS, the k_thread_name_copy() syscall verifier (z_vrfy_k_thread_name_copy()) fails to validate the return value from k_object_find() before dereferencing it. An unprivileged user-mode thread can pass any non-NULL unregistered pointer to trigger a NULL pointer dereference in kernel mode, causing kernel panic/reboot (DoS).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, < 4.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify CONFIG_USERSPACE is enabledInspect the Zephyr build configuration (prj.conf, defconfig, or .config) for the line CONFIG_USERSPACE=yAffected if CONFIG_USERSPACE is set to y
-
Verify CONFIG_THREAD_NAME is enabledInspect the Zephyr build configuration for the line CONFIG_THREAD_NAME=yAffected if CONFIG_THREAD_NAME is set to y
-
Confirm user mode threads are in useCheck if the application creates user mode threads (K_USER thread options) or loads user mode modules via K_MODULE or K_OBJECTAffected if The system runs user-mode threads alongside the vulnerable syscall interface
-
Check Zephyr version against fixed releaseLocate the Zephyr version in the build artifacts or SDK (typically in version.c, or the zephyr version string from 'west version' or 'git describe --tags')Affected if The installed Zephyr version predates the security fix for this syscall validation issue
The system is affected if CONFIG_USERSPACE and CONFIG_THREAD_NAME are both enabled in the build configuration and the Zephyr version has not yet received the k_object_find() return value validation patch.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.5.0
Update Zephyr to the patched version. For mitigation, verify that CONFIG_USERSPACE and CONFIG_THREAD_NAME are not both enabled in production builds unless the fix is applied.
Upgrade to Zephyr v4.4.1 or later (the fix was merged after v4.4.0)
- Apply the fix to kernel/thread.c in the z_vrfy_k_thread_name_copy() function: change the NULL check from 'if (thread == NULL)' to 'if (ko == NULL)' before dereferencing ko->type
- Rebuild the Zephyr image with CONFIG_USERSPACE and CONFIG_THREAD_NAME enabled
- Verify the fix by testing k_thread_name_copy() with an arbitrary unregistered pointer - the system call should now return an error instead of crashing
- Alternatively, upgrade to a release version that includes this fix (see upgrade_path)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10670 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10670 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data