CVE-2026-10672
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedsubsys/net/lib/lwm2m/lwm2m_pull_context.c copied the firmware-update Package URI into a fixed static buffer (context.uri, size CONFIG_LWM2M_SWMGMT_PACKAGE_URI_LEN, default 128) with memcpy(context.uri, uri, LWM2M_PACKAGE_URI_LEN), copying exactly the destination size with no length validation. The Firmware-Update object stores the server-supplied Package URI (/5/0/1) in a 255-byte buffer, so a LwM2M management server (or an on-path attacker on a session lacking strong DTLS) can WRITE a URI of 128-254 characters; only the first 128 bytes are then copied into context.uri with no NUL terminator. That buffer is subsequently consumed as a C string by http_parser_parse_url(context.uri, strlen(context.uri), ...), strlen-based CoAP URI-path/PROXY-URI option appends, and lwm2m_parse_peerinfo(), causing an out-of-bounds read of adjacent static memory. The over-read bytes are appended to outbound CoAP requests (information disclosure of adjacent device memory to the server/proxy) and can crash the device (denial of service). The vulnerable copy was introduced by the pull-context refactor (first released in v3.0.0) and is present through v4.4.0; the default-on CONFIG_LWM2M_FIRMWARE_UPDATE_PULL_SUPPORT path is affected. The fix adds a strlen(uri) >= sizeof(context.uri) check returning -ENOMEM and switches to strcpy(), guaranteeing a bounded, NUL-terminated buffer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Zephyr RTOS LwM2M implementation, lwm2m_pull_context.c copies a server-supplied firmware-update Package URI into a fixed 128-byte buffer via memcpy without validating length. A malicious or compromised LwM2M server can send a URI of 128-254 bytes; only the first 128 bytes are copied with no NUL terminator. Subsequent string operations (strlen, http_parser_parse_url, URI-path appends) read beyond the buffer boundary, causing information disclosure of adjacent device memory to the server and potential device crashes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.7.1= 4.2.1= 4.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm LwM2M firmware pull is enabledInspect build configuration files (prj.conf, defconfig) or run 'grep -r CONFIG_LWM2M_FIRMWARE_UPDATE_PULL_SUPPORT' in the project build directory. Check for CONFIG_LWM2M_FIRMWARE_UPDATE_PULL_SUPPORT=yAffected if CONFIG_LWM2M_FIRMWARE_UPDATE_PULL_SUPPORT is set to y (enabled)
-
Identify Zephyr RTOS versionCheck the version of Zephyr RTOS used in the firmware build. Look for VERSION or KERNEL_VERSION variables in build logs, or check the 'version' file in the Zephyr SDK installation directory, or inspect the 'west.yml' manifest file for the 'version' tagAffected if Version is earlier than v4.4.1 (the fixed release)
-
Verify device acts as LwM2M clientReview application code for lwm2m_client_init() or related LwM2M client API calls. Check if the device registers with an LwM2M server (examine network configuration for LwM2M server URI)Affected if Device implements an LwM2M client that connects to a remote server
-
Check if firmware update objects are registeredExamine application source code for lwm2m_engine_create_obj_inst() calls for /5/0/0 (Firmware Update object) or examine the compiled binary for LwM2M object 5 referencesAffected if Firmware Update object (Object ID 5) is instantiated in the LwM2M client
-
Inspect buffer configuration in lwm2m_pull_context.cIf source code is accessible, locate the hardcoded 128-byte buffer (e.g., char uri[128] or #define PACKAGE_URI_LEN 128) used for Package URI in lwm2m_pull_context.c. Verify no bounds checking exists before memcpyAffected if A 128-byte fixed buffer is used without length validation prior to memcpy
Device is affected if it uses Zephyr RTOS versions prior to v4.4.1 with CONFIG_LWM2M_FIRMWARE_UPDATE_PULL_SUPPORT enabled and implements the LwM2M client with Firmware Update object, allowing a malicious server to supply an oversized URI that overflows the fixed buffer.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to Zephyr RTOS v4.4.1 or later which includes the strlen bounds check and proper NUL-terminated string copy; alternatively, disable CONFIG_LWM2M_FIRMWARE_UPDATE_PULL_SUPPORT if firmware pull is not required.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10672 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10672 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data