VulnerabilityAwaiting classification

CVE-2026-10706

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 7 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Adalo’s no-code app builder, (Versions 1 and 2) the attackers may extract full user records and correlate user behavior across multiple applications via dbId enumeration. The platform does not implement data minimization, privacy by design, or implement appropriate technical safeguards, allowing sensitive information to be exposed to unauthorized parties.

In the news

Third-party coverage
Trending covered by 1 outlet this week · latest 5d ago

Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Adalo no-code platform (Versions 1 and 2) allows attackers to enumerate database IDs (dbId) to extract full user records and correlate user behavior across multiple applications. This occurs because the platform lacks data minimization, privacy-by-design principles, and appropriate technical access controls, enabling unauthorized exposure of sensitive user information.

MitigationImplement proper access controls, rate limiting, and authentication/authorization checks on database queries to prevent enumeration. Apply privacy-by-design principles including data minimization to restrict the exposure of user records to only authorized parties.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Adalo platform is in use
    Inventory your deployed applications and services to identify any using the Adalo no-code platform. Check application metadata, dependencies, or infrastructure configurations for 'Adalo' references.
    Affected if Adalo no-code platform (version 1 or 2) is deployed in the environment
  2. Identify the Adalo version
    Locate the version identifier for your Adalo installation through admin console, configuration files, or software bill of materials. Compare against versions 1 and 2.
    Affected if Running Adalo version 1 or version 2 (any subversion)
  3. Inspect database query API endpoints
    Review API endpoints or internal database query interfaces that accept database IDs (dbId) as parameters. Check if these endpoints are accessible without authentication or proper authorization headers.
    Affected if Database query endpoints accept dbId parameters and are accessible without valid authentication tokens or session cookies
  4. Test for unauthorized ID enumeration
    Using a test account or unauthenticated session, attempt to access sequential or predictable dbId values (e.g., dbId 1, 2, 3...) via the API. Observe if each request returns full user records or sensitive personal data without authorization errors.
    Affected if Sequential dbId enumeration returns user records, profiles, or behavioral data without 403/401 authorization failures
  5. Verify cross-application data correlation exposure
    Test whether different applications' user IDs can be correlated by enumerating dbIds across multiple application contexts, checking if user identity or behavioral data from one application leaks into another.
    Affected if User records exposed via dbId enumeration contain cross-application identifiers or behavioral data that should be isolated per-application

A user is affected if their Adalo environment (v1 or v2) exposes database query endpoints that allow unauthenticated or unauthorized enumeration of sequential dbId values to retrieve user records.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper access controls, rate limiting, and authentication/authorization checks on database queries to prevent enumeration. Apply privacy-by-design principles including data minimization to restrict the exposure of user records to only authorized parties.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation12.0 h
  • Implementation32.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
68.0 hours of engineering $12,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $19,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10706 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10706 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data