CVE-2026-10738
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe jQuery Hover Footnotes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Footnote Qualifier ('{{...}}' Syntax) in all versions up to, and including, 1.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The attribute-breakout payload (e.g., a double-quote followed by an event handler) contains no angle brackets and therefore bypasses WordPress core's wp_kses_post() filtering, which only strips disallowed HTML tags rather than sanitizing attribute contexts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe jQuery Hover Footnotes WordPress plugin fails to properly sanitize footnote qualifiers in the {{...}} syntax before outputting them in HTML attributes. An authenticated attacker with author-level access can inject XSS by breaking out of attribute contexts using a double-quote followed by an event handler (e.g., onmouseover), bypassing wp_kses_post() which only removes HTML tags but doesn't sanitize attribute values.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin installation and versionCheck the installed version of the jQuery Hover Footnotes plugin in WordPress under Plugins > Installed Plugins, or inspect the plugin header file for the Version fieldAffected if The installed version is 1.4 or any earlier version (versions 'up to 1.4' are affected)
-
Confirm plugin is activeVerify the jQuery Hover Footnotes plugin is currently activated on the siteAffected if The plugin is active and the version is 1.4 or earlier
-
Identify users with author-level or higher permissionsNavigate to Users > All Users in WordPress admin and review roles; check for any users with Author, Editor, or Administrator roles who have access to create or edit contentAffected if There are untrusted or compromised author-level or higher user accounts on the site
-
Inspect post content for footnote qualifier syntaxSearch the wp_posts table or use a plugin to examine post content for the literal string '{{' which indicates footnote qualifiers are in useAffected if Posts or pages contain footnote qualifiers using the '{{...}}' syntax and the plugin version is 1.4 or earlier
-
Examine footnote content for XSS payloadsReview the content within footnote qualifiers for patterns like {{...}} with double-quote characters followed by event handlers such as onmouseover, onfocus, or onerror (no angle brackets needed)Affected if Any footnote qualifiers contain double-quote breakout patterns or event handler attributes that could execute malicious scripts
The environment is affected if the jQuery Hover Footnotes plugin version 1.4 or earlier is installed and active, and untrusted author-level users can create content containing the '{{...}}' footnote qualifier syntax.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to a version that properly sanitizes output in attribute contexts, or implement context-aware escaping (esc_attr()) for footnote content rendered within HTML attributes.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10738 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10738 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data