CVE-2026-10763
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPROMOD V is using insecure HTTP communication instead of HTTPS. The vulnerability is due to the lack of HTTPS support from 3rd party Digipede server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePROMOD V transmits data over insecure HTTP instead of HTTPS, exposing traffic to interception or modification. The vulnerability stems from a 3rd party Digipede server that lacks HTTPS support, preventing secure communication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- A
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm PROMOD V installationCheck system for PROMOD V software installation - look for installation directories, running processes, or installed programs named 'PROMOD' or 'PROMOD V'Affected if PROMOD V is installed and in use
-
Locate Digipede server configurationSearch for configuration files related to Digipede connectivity - look for files containing 'digipede', 'server', or 'connection' in PROMOD directories, typically in config or settings foldersAffected if A Digipede server connection is configured
-
Inspect server URL protocolOpen the Digipede configuration file and check the server URL - look for 'http://' prefix versus 'https://' in the server address fieldAffected if The server URL starts with 'http://' instead of 'https://'
-
Check for TLS certificate configurationLook for SSL certificate, TLS certificate, or key file references in the Digipede or PROMOD configuration - check for .pem, .crt, .key files or certificate store settingsAffected if No TLS/SSL certificates are configured for the Digipede connection
-
Verify network traffic flowUse network monitoring or check proxy/gateway settings to confirm the communication path between PROMOD V and Digipede server uses unencrypted HTTPAffected if Network traffic to the Digipede server is transmitted in plaintext over HTTP
You are affected if PROMOD V is installed and configured to communicate with a Digipede server using unencrypted HTTP instead of HTTPS.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataEnable HTTPS on the Digipede server by obtaining and configuring TLS certificates, or implement a secure intermediary (reverse proxy, VPN, or API gateway) to terminate HTTPS and communicate securely with the HTTP endpoint.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10763 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10763 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data