CVE-2026-1079
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA native messaging host vulnerability in Pega Browser Extension (PBE) affects users of all versions of Pega Robotic Automation who have installed Pega Browser Extension. A bad actor could create a website that contains malicious code that targets PBE. The vulnerability could occur if a user navigates to this website. The malicious website could then present an unexpected message box.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Pega Browser Extension contains a native messaging host vulnerability where the extension does not properly validate the origin of messages received from web pages. A malicious website can send specially crafted messages to the native messaging host component, causing it to display unexpected message boxes to the user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Pega Browser Extension is installedOpen your browser's extension management page (chrome://extensions for Chrome, about:addons for Firefox) and look for 'Pega' or 'Pega Browser Extension' in the list of installed extensions.Affected if The extension appears in the browser's list of installed extensions.
-
Identify the installed extension versionIn the browser's extension management page, locate the Pega Browser Extension and note the version number displayed. For Chrome, enable Developer mode to see version details. For Firefox, click on the extension to view its details.Affected if A version number is displayed for the Pega Browser Extension.
-
Verify native messaging host configurationCheck for native messaging host configuration files or registry entries. On Windows, look in the registry under HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Google\Chrome\NativeMessagingHosts\ or HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Google\Chrome\NativeMessagingHosts\ for entries containing 'Pega'. On macOS/Linux, check ~/Library/Application Support/Google/Chrome/NativeMessagingHosts/ or /etc/chromium/native-messaging-hosts/.Affected if A native messaging host entry for Pega exists in the registry or as a manifest file.
-
Locate the native messaging host executableIf native messaging is configured, find the associated executable file. The registry entry or manifest file will contain a path to a .exe (Windows), .app (macOS), or binary (Linux) that serves as the native messaging host for Pega.Affected if A native messaging host executable file associated with Pega is found on the system.
-
Compare installed version to any known affected versionsDocument the exact version number found in step 2. Since no specific version ranges are provided in the CVE, compare your version against any Pega release notes or security advisories related to CVE-2026-1079.Affected if The installed version matches or predates any version noted as vulnerable in official Pega documentation.
You are affected if the Pega Browser Extension is installed and the native messaging host component is enabled, regardless of version, since the vulnerability stems from missing origin validation in the native messaging implementation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUsers should avoid navigating to untrusted websites while the Pega Browser Extension is installed. Organizations should assess whether the Pega Browser Extension is required and consider disabling or removing it if unused, or implement additional browser-based restrictions.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1079 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1079 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data