CVE-2026-10811
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in itsourcecode Fees Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /receipt.php. Such manipulation of the argument ef_id leads to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Fees Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate the ef_id parameter in /receipt.php to inject malicious SQL queries. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 6.3 (MEDIUM) and a public exploit is available.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed applicationLocate the Fees Management System on your server and confirm the application name matches 'itsourcecode Fees Management System'Affected if The application is not this specific product
-
Check the software versionExamine the application's version information (typically in about page, config files, or source code headers)Affected if The version is not 1.0 (the only affected version listed)
-
Locate the receipt.php fileSearch the web root or application directory for a file named receipt.phpAffected if The file receipt.php does not exist in the application
-
Verify the ef_id parameter existsReview receipt.php source code and look for usage of the 'ef_id' GET or POST parameter in SQL query contextsAffected if The ef_id parameter is not present or not used in database queries
-
Check for SQL injection mitigationInspect receipt.php to determine if the ef_id parameter is passed directly to SQL queries without parameterized queries, prepared statements, or input sanitizationAffected if The code uses direct string concatenation with ef_id in SQL queries without sanitization or parameterized queries
You are affected if you run itsourcecode Fees Management System version 1.0 and the receipt.php file with the unprotected ef_id parameter is accessible in your environment
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements in receipt.php, implement strict input validation for the ef_id parameter, and conduct thorough testing to verify the injection vector is eliminated.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-10811 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-10811 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data