ChromeWeb browser · Google

CVE-2026-11011

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 149.0.7827.53 or later.
See remediation →
88/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Insufficient policy enforcement in Password Manager in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Google Chrome's Password Manager had insufficient policy enforcement that allowed a compromised renderer process to bypass site isolation protections. This security boundary flaw could enable a remote attacker with renderer code execution to access password data across different origins via crafted HTML pages.

MitigationUpdate Google Chrome to version 149.0.7827.53 or later to patch the insufficient policy enforcement in the Password Manager.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ChromeWeb browser
Affected:< 149.0.7827.53

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Google Chrome is installed
    Open Chrome and navigate to chrome://version, or run 'google-chrome --version' in terminal, or check Programs and Features on Windows
    Affected if Google Chrome is present on the system
  2. Determine installed Chrome version
    Locate the version number displayed in chrome://version or the command output. Note the three-part version number (e.g., 149.0.7827.53)
    Affected if Version is below 149.0.7827.53 (e.g., 148.x.x.x or earlier)
  3. Verify Password Manager is enabled
    Navigate to chrome://settings/passwords in Chrome. Check if 'Offer to save passwords' or 'Google Password Manager' toggle is enabled
    Affected if Password Manager is enabled (default state) - this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable
  4. Confirm site isolation settings
    Navigate to chrome://flags/#site-isolation-trial-opt-out. Check if site isolation has been disabled or customized
    Affected if Site isolation has been disabled or weakened - however note that the vulnerability allows bypassing these protections even when enabled

User is affected if Google Chrome version is below 149.0.7827.53 and Password Manager is enabled, as the vulnerability allows a compromised renderer process to bypass site isolation and access password data across origins.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 149.0.7827.53 or later
Fixed in 149.0.7827.53
Interim mitigation

Update Google Chrome to version 149.0.7827.53 or later to patch the insufficient policy enforcement in the Password Manager.

Recommended fix High confidence

Chrome 149.0.7827.53 or later

  1. 1. Open Google Chrome browser
  2. 2. Click on the three-dot menu in the top-right corner
  3. 3. Navigate to Help > About Google Chrome
  4. 4. The browser will check for updates and automatically download Chrome version 149.0.7827.53 or later
  5. 5. Click 'Relaunch' to restart Chrome and apply the update

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Chrome Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-11011 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-11011 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data