CVE-2026-11311
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen NGINX Plus is configured as the data plane for NGINX Gateway Fabric, an injection vulnerability exists in the NGINX configuration generator component of NGINX Gateway Fabric. User-supplied string values from the NginxProxy Custom Resource Definition serverTokens field and the AuthenticationFilter Custom Resource Definition extraAuthArgs field are rendered directly into NGINX configuration templates without sanitization or escaping. An authenticated attacker with permission to create or modify these Custom Resource Definitions may craft values that inject arbitrary NGINX configuration directives. This is a control plane issue; there is no data plane exposure from the vulnerability trigger itself. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a configuration injection vulnerability in NGINX Gateway Fabric's NGINX configuration generator. Authenticated attackers with permissions to create or modify NginxProxy or AuthenticationFilter CRDs can supply specially crafted values in the serverTokens and extraAuthArgs fields that get rendered directly into NGINX config templates without sanitization, enabling injection of arbitrary NGINX directives.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.5.0, < 2.6.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify F5 Nginx Gateway Fabric installation and versionRun 'kubectl get pods -n <namespace> -o jsonpath="{.items[0].spec.containers[0].image}"' to retrieve the nginx-gateway-fabric container image, then extract the version from the image tagAffected if The installed version is >= 2.5.0 and < 2.6.4
-
Check for NginxProxy CRDs in the clusterRun 'kubectl get nginxproxies -A' to list all NginxProxy resources, then 'kubectl get nginxproxy <name> -n <namespace> -o yaml' to inspect each one for serverTokens or extraAuthArgs fieldsAffected if Any NginxProxy resource contains configured serverTokens or extraAuthArgs fields with user-supplied values
-
Check for AuthenticationFilter CRDs in the clusterRun 'kubectl get authenticationfilters -A' to list all AuthenticationFilter resources, then inspect each for extraAuthArgs field configurationAffected if Any AuthenticationFilter resource contains configured extraAuthArgs fields with user-supplied values
-
Inspect generated NGINX configurationAccess the nginx.conf generated by the gateway fabric (typically via configdump or by exec into the nginx-gateway-fabric pod and cat the config file) and search for directive patterns that appear injected or unexpected in sections related to server_tokens or auth_request_setAffected if The generated NGINX config contains directives in server_tokens or auth_request_set sections that were not intentionally configured or contain shell-like characters
You are affected if F5 Nginx Gateway Fabric version is between 2.5.0 and 2.6.4 (exclusive) AND you have NginxProxy or AuthenticationFilter CRDs with serverTokens or extraAuthArgs fields configured using untrusted input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.6.4
Implement strict input validation and escaping for the serverTokens and extraAuthArgs fields in the CRD controllers before rendering into templates, using allowlist validation where possible.
Nginx Gateway Fabric >= 2.6.4
- 1. Identify the current Nginx Gateway Fabric version deployed in your cluster using 'kubectl get pods -n <namespace>' or your Helm release
- 2. Review the NginxProxy and AuthenticationFilter Custom Resource Definitions in your cluster for any user-supplied values in the serverTokens and extraAuthArgs fields respectively
- 3. Plan an upgrade to Nginx Gateway Fabric version 2.6.4 or later
- 4. Before upgrading, backup your existing CRD configurations
- 5. Execute the upgrade using your existing deployment method (Helm upgrade or kubectl apply)
- 6. After upgrade, verify that Nginx Gateway Fabric pods are running correctly
- 7. Validate that existing NginxProxy and AuthenticationFilter resources are functioning as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-11311 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-11311 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data