CVE-2026-11348
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Liman MYS allows Fake the Source of Data. This issue affects Liman MYS: before release.Master.1107.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper cryptographic signature verification in HAVELSAN Liman MYS allows attackers to spoof the source of data by presenting falsified signed data. The vulnerability exists in the signature validation logic before release.Master.1107, enabling authentication bypass where malicious data appears to originate from a trusted source.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Liman MYS versionLocate the Liman MYS installation directory and check for version information files, typically found in /opt/liman or the application's base directory. Look for version manifest files, about pages within the web interface, or run 'liman --version' if the CLI is available.Affected if The installed version is release.Master.1106 or earlier (any version before release.Master.1107)
-
Locate signature validation configurationSearch for configuration files related to signature verification, typically in /etc/liman, the config/ directory, or within the web application's settings. Look for files named signature.conf, verification.yml, or similar containing 'signature', 'verify', or 'cryptographic' keywords.Affected if Signature validation is enabled in the configuration (the vulnerability only applies when this feature is active)
-
Check signature validation module statusExamine the Liman MYS administrative interface or check the running services for modules related to data signing or signature verification. Look for entries in the plugin/module list that handle signed data or cryptographic validation.Affected if The signature validation module is loaded or enabled in the running system
-
Review signature validation logsCheck application logs in /var/log/liman or similar directories for entries containing 'signature', 'verification failed', 'invalid signature', or 'authentication bypass'. These logs may indicate whether the flawed validation logic has been exercised.Affected if Logs show signature validation is actively processing signed data requests
-
Verify signature validation behavior with test dataIf possible, attempt to submit a request with falsified signed data to an endpoint that uses signature validation. Observe whether the application accepts or rejects improperly signed data from an untrusted source.Affected if The application accepts falsified signed data that should be rejected (indicates the vulnerability is present)
A user is affected if their Liman MYS installation is release.Master.1106 or earlier AND the signature validation feature is enabled and actively processing signed data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Liman MYS to release.Master.1107 or later which contains the cryptographic signature verification fix. Verify that signature validation correctly rejects improperly signed data from untrusted sources.
release.Master.1107 or later
- 1. Backup the current Liman MYS installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade
- 2. Download the latest Liman MYS release (release.Master.1107 or later) from the official HAVELSAN repository or distribution channel
- 3. Review the upgrade documentation provided with release.Master.1107 for any specific migration requirements
- 4. Stop the Liman MYS services
- 5. Install the new release.Master.1107 package
- 6. Verify the integrity of downloaded packages using official checksums/signatures provided by HAVELSAN
- 7. Start the Liman MYS services after installation
- 8. Verify that Liman MYS is functioning correctly and that the signature verification is working properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-11348 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-11348 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data