CVE-2026-11372
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.2 through 5.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM TRIRIGA Application Platform versions 5.0.2 through 5.0.3 contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An authenticated user can embed arbitrary JavaScript code into the Web UI, which executes in the browsers of other users viewing the affected interface, potentially exposing credentials or session data within a trusted session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0.2= 5.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify IBM TRIRIGA versionAccess the IBM TRIRIGA administration console or check the installed version through the system's 'About' or version information page. Common paths include the admin dashboard or system information panel within the application.Affected if The installed version is exactly 5.0.2 or 5.0.3
-
Confirm Web UI is enabledCheck if the IBM TRIRIGA web interface is accessible and active. Verify that users can log in through the browser-based UI.Affected if The Web UI is accessible and users can authenticate to the platform
-
Review application audit logs for XSS payloadsExamine IBM TRIRIGA audit logs or database records for any suspicious JavaScript tags, script elements, or event handler attributes (such as onerror, onload) that may have been submitted through form fields or interface inputs.Affected if Logs or stored data contain unsanitized script tags or JavaScript event handlers
-
Inspect user-submitted content storageCheck database tables or content management areas where user input is stored and rendered in the Web UI, such as document metadata, user profiles, or custom fields.Affected if Stored content allows rendering of raw HTML or script tags without output encoding
-
Verify Content Security Policy configurationCheck the web server or application configuration for Content-Security-Policy headers. Inspect if the CSP allows inline scripts (unsafe-inline) or sources not explicitly whitelisted.Affected if CSP is missing, not enforced, or permits inline script execution
A user is affected if they are running IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform version 5.0.2 or 5.0.3 with the Web UI enabled and authentication available to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the IBM-provided patch or upgrade to a version beyond 5.0.3. Implement output encoding and input validation as compensating controls until the vendor fix is available. Review and enforce Content Security Policy headers.
Upgrade to a stable release newer than 5.0.3 (e.g., 5.1.0 or latest available stable version)
- 1. Identify the current IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform version in use (should be 5.0.2 or 5.0.3 as stated in the CVE).
- 2. Check IBM's official support portal or security bulletins for the specific patch addressing CVE-2026-11372.
- 3. If a patch is available, apply it following IBM's standard patch deployment procedures for TRIRIGA.
- 4. If no specific patch is available, upgrade to a version newer than 5.0.3 (e.g., 5.1.0 or later stable release).
- 5. After upgrade/patch, validate that the XSS vulnerability is remediated by testing that user-supplied input in Web UI fields is properly escaped.
- 6. Clear browser caches and test within a trusted session to confirm the fix.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-11372 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-11372 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data