CVE-2026-11457
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in erzhongxmu JeeWMS up to 141740afb2ba14d441c82a833d0a418d07ca2d69. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /base-boot/jmreport/testConnection of the component JimuReport test-connection Endpoint. Performing a manipulation of the argument dbType/dbDriver/dbUrl/dbUsername/dbPassword results in injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the JimuReport test-connection endpoint (/base-boot/jmreport/testConnection) of erzhongxmu JeeWMS. The endpoint accepts unsanitized input for database connection parameters (dbType, dbDriver, dbUrl, dbUsername, dbPassword), allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands. Public exploits are available.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm JeeWMS installationIdentify if JeeWMS is deployed in your environment by checking for the presence of the application or its typical deployment artifacts (war files, JAR files, or web application directories containing 'jeewms' or 'JeeWMS' in the name).Affected if JeeWMS is installed and running in the environment.
-
Locate the vulnerable endpointCheck if the URL path /base-boot/jmreport/testConnection is accessible by inspecting your web server's configured routes or by attempting a HEAD request to the endpoint (ensure this is done in an authorized testing environment only).Affected if The endpoint /base-boot/jmreport/testConnection responds to requests (returns any HTTP status other than 404).
-
Verify endpoint accepts database connection parametersInspect the application's API documentation, Swagger/OpenAPI definitions, or perform authorized traffic analysis to confirm the endpoint accepts the parameters: dbType, dbDriver, dbUrl, dbUsername, dbPassword.Affected if The endpoint accepts one or more of these database connection parameters (dbType, dbDriver, dbUrl, dbUsername, dbPassword).
-
Check for input validation on connection parametersReview the application's source code (if accessible) or proxy logs to determine whether the endpoint implements input validation, sanitization, or parameterized queries for the database connection parameters before using them in SQL or connection operations.Affected if No input validation, sanitization, or parameterized queries are implemented for the database connection parameters, or validation is confirmed to be absent or weak.
-
Assess network exposure of the endpointReview firewall rules, web server access controls, or API gateway policies to determine if the /base-boot/jmreport/testConnection endpoint is accessible from untrusted networks or without authentication.Affected if The endpoint is exposed to untrusted networks or accessible without requiring administrator-level authentication.
If JeeWMS is installed, the testConnection endpoint is accessible, and no input validation is enforced on the database connection parameters (dbType, dbDriver, dbUrl, dbUsername, dbPassword), then the environment is affected by CVE-2026-11457.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and parameterized queries for database connection parameters. Consider restricting access to this endpoint or adding authentication. Alternatively, deploy a WAF rule to block injection attempts until the code fix is applied.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-11457 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-11457 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data