Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2026-11467

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A security vulnerability has been detected in jishenghua jshERP up to 3.6. This vulnerability affects the function addAccountHeadAndDetail of the file jshERP-boot/src/main/java/com/jsh/erp/service/AccountHeadService.java of the component addAccountHeadAndDetail Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument fileName leads to path traversal. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Path traversal vulnerability in jshERP's addAccountHeadAndDetail endpoint allows remote attackers to manipulate the fileName parameter with directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../../) to write files to arbitrary locations on the server. The vulnerability exists in AccountHeadService.java where user-supplied filename input is not properly validated or sanitized before file operations.

MitigationImplement strict input validation on the fileName parameter to reject directory traversal sequences and path characters. Store uploaded files in a secure, non-executable directory with randomized filenames, and use allowlist validation for permitted characters.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm jshERP installation and version
    Locate the jshERP application in your environment and identify its version by checking deployment manifests, pom.xml, or application metadata files
    Affected if The installed version of jshERP matches the version range containing the vulnerable AccountHeadService.java component
  2. Locate AccountHeadService.java in the deployment
    Search the deployed application files for AccountHeadService.java, typically found under src/main/java in the ERP source or decompiled in the deployed WAR/WEB-INF directory
    Affected if The file exists and contains the addAccountHeadAndDetail function
  3. Verify fileName parameter handling in addAccountHeadAndDetail
    Inspect the addAccountHeadAndDetail function code to examine how the fileName parameter is processed - look for any input validation, sanitization, or path resolution logic applied to this parameter
    Affected if The code directly uses the fileName parameter without validation or contains path traversal sequences (../, ..\) in the logic without rejection mechanisms
  4. Check if AccountHead endpoint is accessible
    Determine if the HTTP endpoint exposing addAccountHeadAndDetail is exposed by checking application routing configuration, typically mapped to account-related API paths in jshERP
    Affected if The endpoint is reachable over the network without additional authentication beyond low-privilege user access

You are affected if jshERP is deployed with the vulnerable AccountHeadService.java containing addAccountHeadAndDetail that processes a fileName parameter without rejecting path traversal sequences.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation on the fileName parameter to reject directory traversal sequences and path characters. Store uploaded files in a secure, non-executable directory with randomized filenames, and use allowlist validation for permitted characters.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-11467 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-11467 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data