Incorrect Privilege AssignmentWeakness · CWE-266

CVE-2026-11476

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A security vulnerability has been detected in Kushan2k student-management-system up to f16a4ceaddd6729c4b306ed4641cda3176c1ef2a. Affected by this issue is the function edit-admin of the file controllers/AdminController.php of the component Profile Update Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument isadmin leads to improper authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The edit-admin function in controllers/AdminController.php of the Kushan2k student-management-system suffers from an improper authorization vulnerability. The isadmin parameter can be manipulated during profile updates, allowing privilege escalation where a user could potentially grant themselves administrative privileges. This is a classic Broken Access Control / Insecure Direct Object Reference issue.

MitigationImplement server-side authorization checks to verify the requesting user has proper admin privileges before allowing profile modifications. The isadmin parameter should be validated against the current user's actual role, not accepted from client input. Consider implementing role-based access control (RBAC) with proper session validation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the Kushan2k student-management-system installation
    Search the server for AdminController.php file, typically found in application/controllers/ or similar MVC paths
    Affected if The file AdminController.php exists in the application
  2. Verify the edit-admin function exists in AdminController.php
    Open AdminController.php and locate the edit-admin or editAdmin function definition
    Affected if The edit-admin function exists in AdminController.php and processes the isadmin parameter
  3. Check if isadmin parameter is processed without role validation
    Examine the edit-admin function code to see if it validates the requesting user's role before allowing modification of the isadmin parameter
    Affected if The isadmin parameter is accepted and processed without verifying the current user has admin privileges
  4. Test if the Profile Update Endpoint accepts isadmin parameter manipulation
    Send a Profile Update request to the edit-admin endpoint with isadmin=1 or isadmin=true while logged in as a non-admin user
    Affected if The request succeeds and the user's admin status is modified without proper authorization
  5. Review user role permission checks in the function
    Search the edit-admin function for role-based access control (RBAC) checks, such as checking if the user is_admin, has_permission, or isAuthorized before allowing isadmin parameter updates
    Affected if No authorization check exists before allowing modification of the isadmin parameter

If the Kushan2k student-management-system is installed and the edit-admin function allows manipulation of the isadmin parameter without verifying the requesting user's admin privileges, the environment is affected by CVE-2026-11476.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement server-side authorization checks to verify the requesting user has proper admin privileges before allowing profile modifications. The isadmin parameter should be validated against the current user's actual role, not accepted from client input. Consider implementing role-based access control (RBAC) with proper session validation.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-11476 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-11476 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data