CVE-2026-11541
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM CICS Transaction Gateway for Multiplatforms 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, and 10.1 IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 and IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6 are affected by an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, 8.5 and WebSphere Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6 contain an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate how HTTP requests are parsed by front-end and back-end servers, potentially bypassing security controls and gaining unauthorized access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.5.0.0, < 8.5.5.31>= 9.0.0.0, < 9.0.5.29>= 17.0.0.3, <= 26.0.0.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WebSphere Application Server traditional edition versionCheck the version using the versionInfo.sh script in the bin directory: ./versionInfo.sh | grep -i version, or inspect the install_dir/properties/version/Version.info fileAffected if The installed version is >= 8.5.0.0 and < 8.5.5.31, OR >= 9.0.0.0 and < 9.0.5.29
-
Identify WebSphere Liberty versionCheck the version by inspecting the lib/versions/libVersions.xml file, or run: java -jar wlp/lib/versions/libVersions.xml, or check the server.xml for the version attributeAffected if The installed version is >= 17.0.0.3 and <= 26.0.0.6
-
Determine if WebSphere is exposed behind a front-end proxy or load balancerReview network architecture and proxy configuration to identify if an upstream proxy (e.g., IHS, nginx, Apache, HAProxy) forwards requests to WebSphereAffected if A front-end proxy or load balancer is present and forwards requests to WebSphere, creating the parsing mismatch condition for HTTP request smuggling
-
Inspect Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding header handlingReview the server.xml configuration (for Liberty) or httpchannel plugin-cfg.xml (for traditional) for any explicit handling of these headers, and test by sending ambiguous requests with both headers presentAffected if The server accepts and forwards requests containing both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers without rejecting or normalizing them
A user is affected if their WebSphere version falls within the affected ranges AND the server is accessible through a front-end proxy or handles ambiguous HTTP request headers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.5.5.319.0.5.29
Apply IBM security patches for CVE-2026-11541 when available. Review and align Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding header handling between front-end proxies and WebSphere to prevent request smuggling attempts.
WebSphere traditional 8.5.x -> 8.5.5.31+; WebSphere traditional 9.0.x -> 9.0.5.29+; WebSphere Liberty -> latest available fix pack (beyond 26.0.0.6)
- Identify the WebSphere edition in use (traditional or Liberty) by checking the installation directory and version info
- For WebSphere Application Server traditional 8.5.x: Upgrade to version 8.5.5.31 or later by applying the latest fix pack from IBM Fix Central
- For WebSphere Application Server traditional 9.0.x: Upgrade to version 9.0.5.29 or later by applying the latest fix pack from IBM Fix Central
- For WebSphere Liberty (17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6): Download and install the latest available Liberty fix pack from IBM Fix Central which addresses this vulnerability
- After upgrade, verify the new version matches or exceeds the minimum fixed version for your edition
- Test critical applications to ensure functionality is preserved after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-11541 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-11541 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data