CVE-2026-1178
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in Yonyou KSOA 9.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /kmf/select.jsp of the component HTTP GET Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument folderid leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Yonyou KSOA 9.0 select.jsp page allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the folderid GET parameter. The lack of input sanitization or parameterized queries in the HTTP GET Parameter Handler enables attackers to manipulate database queries. Public exploit availability makes this immediately actionable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Yonyou KSOA versionLocate version information for the Yonyou KSOA installation. Check application metadata files, login page source, admin interface, or deployment documentation. If you have access to the application server, examine the WAR/ZIP package or configuration files for version identifiers.Affected if The installed version is exactly 9.0
-
Confirm vulnerable endpoint existsMake an HTTP GET request to /kmf/select.jsp on the target server (e.g., https://target.yourdomain.com/kmf/select.jsp). A successful HTTP response (200 OK) or any application error page confirms the endpoint exists.Affected if The /kmf/select.jsp file is accessible and returns a response from the application
-
Test folderid parameter acceptanceSend a request to /kmf/select.jsp with the folderid parameter (e.g., /kmf/select.jsp?folderid=test). If the application processes this parameter and returns a response rather than rejecting it as an unknown parameter, the application uses this input in database operations.Affected if The folderid GET parameter is accepted and processed by the application
If the environment runs Yonyou KSOA version 9.0 with the /kmf/select.jsp endpoint accessible and the folderid parameter accepted without sanitization, the environment is affected by CVE-2026-1178.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database interactions involving user input, specifically the folderid parameter. Apply input validation and consider deploying a WAF as a temporary compensating control until the code fix is deployed.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1178 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1178 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data