CVE-2026-11848
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe iRM-IEI Remote Management developed by IEI Integration Corp has a Missing Authentication vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to exploit a specific functionality to obtain partial system configuration information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe iRM-IEI Remote Management platform by IEI Integration Corp contains a missing authentication vulnerability in a specific functionality that should require authentication but does not. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to directly access this functionality and retrieve partial system configuration information without any credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify iRM-IEI platform installationLocate and confirm the iRM-IEI Remote Management platform in your environment. Check for running services on common web ports (80, 443, 8080) or review installed software listings for 'iRM' or 'IEI' components.Affected if The iRM-IEI Remote Management platform is present in the environment.
-
Determine platform versionAccess the platform web interface and look for version information typically found in About pages, footer sections, or system information settings. If CLI access is available, check for version commands in the administration tool.Affected if The installed version matches or precedes the vulnerable version range (if known) or cannot be determined, indicating potential exposure.
-
Identify the unauthenticated endpointReview the platform for configuration-related endpoints or APIs that may lack authentication requirements. Common paths include /config, /settings, /system/config, or similar. Attempt direct access to these endpoints without providing credentials.Affected if The endpoint returns system configuration information without requiring any login or authentication tokens.
-
Verify authentication enforcement on configuration functionalityAttempt to access the specific functionality mentioned in the CVE (typically related to system configuration retrieval) using a browser or HTTP client while NOT logged in. Capture the HTTP response code and content.Affected if The functionality returns partial system configuration data (such as network settings, user details, or system parameters) with a 200 OK response and no redirect to a login page.
The environment is affected if the iRM-IEI Remote Management platform is installed and the configuration functionality can be accessed without any authentication credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication enforcement for the vulnerable functionality and validate user session/authorization before permitting access to system configuration data. Consider implementing role-based access controls to limit information disclosure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-11848 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-11848 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data