Devolutions ServerApplication · Devolutions

CVE-2026-12105

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2026.1.22.0 / 2026.2.7.0 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper access control in Devolutions Server 2026.2.5, 2026.1.21 allows an authenticated user to access attachments via folder duplication with inherited permissions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Improper access control in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated user to access attachments via folder duplication with inherited permissions. The vulnerability occurs because folder duplication does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing users to gain access to attachments in duplicated folders that they should not have permissions to view.

MitigationApply vendor security updates (2026.2.6 or later, 2026.1.22 or later) to Devolutions Server. After patching, audit folder permissions and access logs to confirm no unauthorized access occurred.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Devolutions ServerApplication
Affected:< 2026.1.22.0>= 2026.2.4.0, < 2026.2.7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Devolutions Server version
    Locate the installed version of Devolutions Server through the administration console, service information, or installation records. Compare the version number against the affected ranges: < 2026.1.22.0 or >= 2026.2.4.0 and < 2026.2.7.0
    Affected if The installed version falls within < 2026.1.22.0 or >= 2026.2.4.0 but < 2026.2.7.0
  2. Determine if folder duplication has been used
    Review the Devolutions Server environment for any folders that were duplicated, as this feature must be exercised for the access control flaw to be relevant
    Affected if Folder duplication has been performed on the server
  3. Audit attachments in duplicated folders
    Examine attachments stored within duplicated folders and review access logs to identify whether users who should not have permission were able to access these attachments
    Affected if Users accessed attachments in duplicated folders that they were not explicitly granted permission to view

The environment is affected if Devolutions Server version is below 2026.1.22.0 or between 2026.2.4.0 and 2026.2.6.x AND folder duplication has been performed, potentially allowing unauthorized access to attachments.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2026.1.22.0 / 2026.2.7.0 or later
Fixed in 2026.1.22.02026.2.7.0
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor security updates (2026.2.6 or later, 2026.1.22 or later) to Devolutions Server. After patching, audit folder permissions and access logs to confirm no unauthorized access occurred.

Recommended fix High confidence

2026.1.22.0 (for 2026.1.x branch) or 2026.2.7.0 (for 2026.2.x branch)

  1. Identify the currently installed Devolutions Server version by checking the application or system information
  2. If running version < 2026.1.22.0, plan upgrade to version 2026.1.22.0 or later
  3. If running version >= 2026.2.4.0 and < 2026.2.7.0, plan upgrade to version 2026.2.7.0 or later
  4. Obtain the upgrade package from the official Devolutions download center at devolutions.net
  5. Follow standard Devolutions Server upgrade documentation for your deployment type
  6. After upgrade, verify the new version is installed correctly
  7. Test that the authorization controls function properly for attachment access via folder duplication

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Devolutions Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,790
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-12105 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-12105 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data