CVE-2026-12110
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Taskbuilder – Project Management & Task Management Tool With Kanban Board plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'task_search' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.8 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. The wppm_get_task_list AJAX handler performs no capability check and no nonce verification, meaning any authenticated user including those with Subscriber-level access can invoke it directly.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Taskbuilder WordPress plugin versions up to 5.0.8 contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the wppm_get_task_list AJAX handler. The 'task_search' parameter is insufficiently escaped and the existing SQL query lacks prepared statement usage, allowing authenticated attackers with subscriber-level access to inject arbitrary SQL queries and extract sensitive database information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Taskbuilder plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Taskbuilder' in the list. Note the version number displayed below the plugin name.Affected if Taskbuilder plugin is not installed or cannot be found in the plugins list
-
Confirm installed version numberCheck the version displayed next to the Taskbuilder plugin name in the WordPress plugins page. Compare it to the affected range: versions 5.0.8 and below are vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is 5.0.8 or lower
-
Identify the vulnerable AJAX endpointInspect the plugin files for the wppm_get_task_list AJAX handler. This is typically registered via add_action('wp_ajax_wppm_get_task_list', ...) or wp_ajax_nopriv_wppm_get_task_list in the plugin PHP files.Affected if The wppm_get_task_list AJAX action is registered in the plugin
-
Verify subscriber-level access to the handlerCheck if the AJAX handler allows access to subscriber-level users. Look for missing capability checks or capability checks that allow 'read' or 'subscriber' roles in the wppm_get_task_list callback function.Affected if The AJAX handler is accessible to users with subscriber-level permissions without proper capability checks
-
Check for unescaped task_search parameter usageReview the wppm_get_task_list handler code to see if the task_search POST/GET parameter is used directly in SQL queries without $wpdb->prepare() or proper escaping using esc_sql().Affected if The task_search parameter is used in SQL queries without prepare() or esc_sql() escaping
If the Taskbuilder plugin version is 5.0.8 or lower and the wppm_get_task_list AJAX handler is accessible to subscriber-level users, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Taskbuilder plugin to a version beyond 5.0.8 that implements proper SQL escaping using $wpdb->prepare(), adds capability checks, and includes nonce verification for the AJAX handler.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-12110 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- www.wordfence.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-12110 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data