Incorrect AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-863

CVE-2026-12352

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated actor to bypass authentication and gain access to restricted resources on the device.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an authentication bypass vulnerability where an unauthenticated remote attacker can circumvent authentication mechanisms to access restricted resources on an affected device. The medium CVSS score (5.9) suggests network-based exploitation with high confidentiality impact but limited integrity or availability impact.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches immediately. If no patch exists, review authentication logic for implementation flaws such as improper session validation, credential handling, or access control checks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the affected application or service
    Determine which service or application is running on the target system that could be subject to this authentication bypass. Review network services, web applications, or system daemons that handle authentication. Use commands like 'netstat -tuln' or 'ps aux' to list running services.
    Affected if The system runs any service that processes authentication credentials and responds to network requests
  2. Determine the installed version of the affected product
    Check the version of the identified application or service. Common methods include: 'command --version', checking in the application's web interface, reviewing package manager output ('dpkg -l', 'rpm -qa'), or examining the binary directly. Compare against any vendor release notes if available.
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within an affected version range (if such ranges become known from vendor advisories)
  3. Verify if remote network access is enabled
    Confirm whether the affected service is exposed to network access. Check firewall rules ('iptables -L', 'ufw status'), network bind addresses in configuration files, and whether the service listens on external interfaces versus localhost only.
    Affected if The service listens on a network-accessible interface (0.0.0.0 or external IP) rather than only localhost
  4. Inspect authentication configuration and session handling
    Review the application's configuration files for authentication settings. Look for parameters controlling session validation, credential storage, and access control. Check for misconfigurations such as disabled authentication flags, permissive ACLs, or improper session token handling.
    Affected if Authentication is disabled, set to permissive modes, or session validation is improperly implemented in config files
  5. Test for unauthenticated access to restricted endpoints
    If safe to do so in a non-production environment, attempt to access restricted resources or administrative functions without providing credentials. Observe whether the application permits access or returns authentication errors. In production, review access logs for unauthorized access attempts.
    Affected if Restricted resources become accessible without valid authentication credentials

A system is affected if it runs the vulnerable product version with network-exposed authentication mechanisms that permit unauthorized access to protected resources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches immediately. If no patch exists, review authentication logic for implementation flaws such as improper session validation, credential handling, or access control checks.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-12352 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-12352 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data