Stack-based Buffer OverflowWeakness · CWE-121

CVE-2026-12485

CRITICAL · 10.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 8 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
GV-I/O Box 4E is a smart embedded device with 4 input and 4 relays output that can be controlled over Ethernet and RS-485. DVRSearch is a service running by default on the IOBox listening for UDP messages on port 10001. Any user on the network can send messages to this service and interact with it. Upon receiving a UDP message, the server reads at most 1460 bytes into a local buffer and a pointer to the buffer is stored in a global variable: #### IP field stack overflow The following code is vulnerable to a stack overflow that is attacker-controlled: v3 = strlen(g_network_config->ip_addr); memcpy(&reply_buf[36], g_network_config->ip_addr, v3);

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stack-based buffer overflow in GV-I/O Box 4E's DVRSearch service (UDP port 10001). The service copies a user-controlled IP address into a fixed 1460-byte buffer at offset 36 using memcpy without bounds checking, allowing remote attackers to overflow the stack with attacker-controlled data.

MitigationIsolate the device behind a firewall to block unauthorized UDP traffic to port 10001; contact vendor for patched firmware that implements proper length validation before the memcpy operation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm device model is GV-I-O Box 4E
    Access the device management interface or check system information to identify the hardware model. Look for GV-I-O Box 4E in device specifications or firmware identification.
    Affected if The device is not a GV-I-O Box 4E - the vulnerability is specific to this model.
  2. Identify if DVRSearch service is running
    Check running processes or services on the device. On Linux-based embedded systems, this may be done via 'ps' command or by checking /proc directory. Look for a process named 'DVRSearch' or a similar service binary.
    Affected if DVRSearch service is not present or not running - the vulnerable code path is not active.
  3. Verify DVRSearch UDP service is enabled
    Check network listening ports on the device. Use 'netstat -uan' or 'ss -uan' to list UDP ports. Look for DVRSearch typically bound to UDP port 4550 or similar DVR discovery ports.
    Affected if No UDP service for DVRSearch is listening - the attack surface is not exposed.
  4. Inspect ip_addr network configuration
    Access the network configuration settings for the DVRSearch service. This is typically found in the device web interface under Network Settings, or in configuration files in /etc or /var directories. Examine the ip_addr field.
    Affected if The ip_addr field contains a value longer than the buffer allows (exceeding typical IP address length of 15 characters plus null terminator) and DVRSearch copies this to the reply buffer at offset 36.

The environment is affected if running GV-I-O Box 4E with DVRSearch service enabled and the ip_addr field in network configuration is accessible to an attacker who can trigger the vulnerable memcpy operation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Isolate the device behind a firewall to block unauthorized UDP traffic to port 10001; contact vendor for patched firmware that implements proper length validation before the memcpy operation.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-12485 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-12485 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data