Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-12580

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
EasyFlow .NET developed by Digiwin has a Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject persistent JavaScript code executed in users' browsers upon page load.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

EasyFlow .NET by Digiwin contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability where authenticated remote attackers can inject persistent malicious JavaScript into application data fields. When other users subsequently view or load affected pages, the embedded script executes in their browsers, potentially enabling session hijacking, credential theft, or defacement.

MitigationImplement robust input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data rendered in pages, sanitize or escape HTML/script content in all form fields and data display areas, and consider implementing Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm EasyFlow .NET is installed
    Locate the EasyFlow .NET application in your environment by checking installed programs, application directories, or the Digiwin software inventory. Look for directories or services named 'EasyFlow', 'Digiwin', or related web applications.
    Affected if EasyFlow .NET by Digiwin is present in your environment
  2. Identify the installed version
    Check the application version by inspecting the assembly information, version file, or configuration files within the EasyFlow .NET installation directory. Common locations include the bin folder, a 'version.txt' file, or the application properties in the control panel.
    Affected if the version cannot be determined or matches any affected version range provided by Digiwin
  3. Verify authentication is enabled
    Confirm that user authentication is configured for EasyFlow .NET. Check the web.config or application configuration files for authentication settings, and verify that user login functionality is active.
    Affected if authentication is enabled and users can log in to the application
  4. Identify accessible data input fields
    Examine the application forms, input fields, and data entry points where users can submit or update information. Review the application's data models and database tables that store user-supplied values.
    Affected if the application contains form fields or data display areas that accept and render user input without visible sanitization
  5. Check for existing XSS protections
    Review the application's input validation, output encoding, or sanitization mechanisms. Look for existing web application firewall rules, Content Security Policy headers, or anti-XSS libraries implemented in the codebase.
    Affected if no robust input validation or output encoding is implemented for data fields rendered in pages

Your environment is likely affected if EasyFlow .NET is installed, authentication is enabled, and user-supplied data fields are rendered without proper sanitization or encoding, allowing stored XSS to execute when other users view the data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement robust input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data rendered in pages, sanitize or escape HTML/script content in all form fields and data display areas, and consider implementing Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
48.0 hours of engineering $8,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $13,440.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-12580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-12580 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data