Open RedirectWeakness · CWE-601

CVE-2026-12863

MEDIUM · 5.1 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-06-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
55/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An unvalidated redirect was contained in Venueless' social login functionality and could be exploited for phishing using trusted domains.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an open redirect vulnerability in Venueless' social login feature where the application fails to validate redirect URLs before forwarding users after authentication. Attackers can craft malicious links using trusted domains (e.g., venueless.example.com) that appear legitimate but redirect users to attacker-controlled sites, enabling phishing attacks.

MitigationImplement strict allowlist-based validation for all redirect URLs in the social login flow, ensuring only registered internal or approved external domains are permitted; also implement the 'rel=noopener' attribute on any links that open new tabs.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
Authentication
X
User interaction
P
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Venueless installation
    Locate the Venueless application in your environment by checking for its web application files, Docker containers, or service processes listening on configured ports.
    Affected if Venueless software is present in the environment
  2. Determine Venueless version
    Check the installed Venueless version by examining package.json, setup.py, requirements.txt, or the application's version endpoint if available.
    Affected if The installed version falls within any affected version range for this vulnerability
  3. Confirm social login feature is enabled
    Review Venueless configuration files (such as config.yaml, config.json, or environment variables) to determine if any social login provider (e.g., OAuth2, OpenID Connect for services like Google, GitHub, or custom OAuth) is configured and active.
    Affected if Social login is enabled and configured in the Venueless instance
  4. Inspect redirect URL handling in social login flow
    Examine the application's authentication callback handlers and redirect logic in the source code or by reviewing network traffic during a social login attempt. Look for how the 'next', 'redirect', or 'state' parameter is processed after authentication.
    Affected if The application accepts and follows redirect URLs without strict allowlist validation of the target domain
  5. Check for domain allowlist configuration
    Review the Venueless configuration to identify whether a domain allowlist or whitelist exists for permitted redirect destinations, and verify if it properly restricts redirect targets to trusted domains only.
    Affected if No strict allowlist-based validation is configured, or the allowlist permits arbitrary external domains

A user is affected if Venueless with social login enabled is running and the redirect URL validation either does not exist or fails to restrict destinations to an explicit allowlist of trusted domains.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict allowlist-based validation for all redirect URLs in the social login flow, ensuring only registered internal or approved external domains are permitted; also implement the 'rel=noopener' attribute on any links that open new tabs.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-12863 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-12863 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data