Geolocation FieldDrupal extension · Dopry

CVE-2026-13242

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.15.0 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Drupal Geolocation Field allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Geolocation Field versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.15.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in Drupal Geolocation Field module allows attackers to inject malicious SQL code through unsanitized user input in SQL queries. This affects all versions from 0.0.0 to 3.15.0. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special elements used in SQL commands.

MitigationUpgrade to a version newer than 3.15.0 when available, or apply vendor-provided patches. If immediate patching is not possible, consider disabling the Geolocation Field module or implementing temporary input filtering at the application layer.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Geolocation FieldDrupal extension
Affected:< 3.15.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Drupal Geolocation Field module is installed
    Check for the geolocation_field module directory in your Drupal installation under modules/ or sites/all/modules/, or query the Drupal system table for the module name 'geolocation_field'.
    Affected if The module directory exists or the module is present in the Drupal system table.
  2. Determine if the Geolocation Field module is enabled
    Query the Drupal system.table where name='geolocation_field' and status=1, or run 'drush pm-list --status=enabled' and look for geolocation_field.
    Affected if The module is enabled (status=1) in Drupal.
  3. Retrieve the installed version of the Geolocation Field module
    Open the geolocation_field.info.yml file in the module directory and read the 'version:' or 'core:' fields, or run 'drush pm-list --format=json' to get version info.
    Affected if The version number is 3.15.0 or lower, or no version is specified (meaning it is within the 0.0.0 to 3.15.0 range).
  4. Check if the module is used in any Views or form configurations
    Search Drupal configuration (config tables or export) for references to 'geolocation_field' in views, forms, or field configurations, or examine the sites/default/files directory for related data.
    Affected if The module is actively used in Views, content types, or form displays where user input could reach SQL queries.

You are affected if the Geolocation Field module is installed, enabled, and running version 3.15.0 or lower, especially if it is in use on your site.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.15.0 or later
Fixed in 3.15.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a version newer than 3.15.0 when available, or apply vendor-provided patches. If immediate patching is not possible, consider disabling the Geolocation Field module or implementing temporary input filtering at the application layer.

Fix this in Geolocation Field Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-13242 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-13242 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data