CVE-2026-13548
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /doctortimings.php. The manipulation of the argument editid leads to sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL queries via the editid parameter in /doctortimings.php. The lack of proper input sanitization or parameterized queries enables attackers to manipulate database queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the Hospital Management System versionLocate the application files or admin interface and identify the installed version of itsourcecode Hospital Management System. Check version files, about pages, or meta headers for version number "1.0" or the specific version string used.Affected if The installed version is itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0 or another version that matches the affected release.
-
Verify doctortimings.php existsCheck the web server document root for the presence of /doctortimings.php file. Attempt to access it via HTTP GET request to the known path.Affected if The file doctortimings.php exists and is accessible via the web server.
-
Test editid parameter accessibilitySend an HTTP request to doctortimings.php with a test value in the editid parameter (e.g., ?editid=1). Observe whether the parameter is processed and reflected in the response.Affected if The editid parameter is accepted and processed by the application without proper input validation or parameterized query handling.
-
Check for SQL error leakageSubmit SQL injection test payloads in the editid parameter (e.g., editid=1' OR '1'='1) and examine the HTTP response for SQL syntax error messages, database warnings, or unexpected data exposure.Affected if The application returns SQL error messages, database structure information, or exhibits query manipulation behavior in response to the test input.
The environment is affected if it runs itsourcecode Hospital Management System with the doctortimings.php file accessible and the editid parameter accepting unsanitized input that produces SQL errors or unexpected behavior.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with prepared statements/parameterized queries for the editid parameter. Apply input validation and implement a web application firewall as a compensating control until the fix is deployed.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-13548 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-13548 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data