CVE-2026-1355
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Missing Authorization vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an attacker to upload unauthorized content to another user’s repository migration export due to a missing authorization check in the repository migration upload endpoint. By supplying the migration identifier, an attacker could overwrite or replace a victim’s migration archive, potentially causing victims to download attacker-controlled repository data during migration restores or automated imports. An attacker would require authentication to the victim's GitHub Enterprise Server instance. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.20 and was fixed in versions 3.19.2, 3.18.5, 3.17.11, 3.16.14, 3.15.18, 3.14.23. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMissing authorization check in GitHub Enterprise Server's repository migration upload endpoint allows authenticated attackers to overwrite victim migration archives by supplying a migration identifier. This enables injection of attacker-controlled data that victims may download during migration restores or automated imports.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.14.23>= 3.15.0, < 3.15.18>= 3.16.0, < 3.16.14>= 3.17.0, < 3.17.11>= 3.18.0, < 3.18.5>= 3.19.0, < 3.19.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed GitHub Enterprise Server versionAccess the GitHub Enterprise Server admin console or run 'ghe-version' in the management shell to retrieve the exact version number.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these vulnerable ranges: < 3.14.23, >= 3.15.0 and < 3.15.18, >= 3.16.0 and < 3.16.14, >= 3.17.0 and < 3.17.11, >= 3.18.0 and < 3.18.5, or >= 3.19.0 and < 3.19.2.
-
Verify repository migration API accessibilityCheck whether the repository migration API endpoints (/api/v3/migrations or similar) are exposed and accessible to authenticated users in the instance.Affected if Migration API endpoints are enabled and accessible to non-admin authenticated users.
-
Review audit logs for migration upload activitySearch enterprise audit logs for entries related to migration archive uploads, specifically looking for migration identifier parameters that may indicate unauthorized overwrites.Affected if Audit logs show migration uploads with migration identifiers that were not created by the requesting user, indicating potential exploitation.
If the GitHub Enterprise Server version is within any of the vulnerable ranges listed, the environment is affected by this missing authorization check in the migration upload endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.14.233.15.183.16.14
Upgrade GitHub Enterprise Server to version 3.19.2, 3.18.5, 3.17.11, 3.16.14, 3.15.18, or 3.14.23 or later to incorporate the authorization fix.
Upgrade to 3.14.23, 3.15.18, 3.16.14, or 3.17.11 (or later) depending on your current version branch; alternatively upgrade to the latest stable release (3.20 or later)
- 1. Identify the current GitHub Enterprise Server version by navigating to the admin console or running: ghe-version
- 2. Determine which version branch you're currently on based on the major.minor version (e.g., 3.14.x, 3.15.x, 3.16.x, 3.17.x)
- 3. Upgrade to the corresponding fixed version for your branch: 3.14.23 (if on 3.14.x), 3.15.18 (if on 3.15.x), 3.16.14 (if on 3.16.x), or 3.17.11 (if on 3.17.x)
- 4. For branches 3.18.x and 3.19.x, upgrade to 3.18.5 and 3.19.2 respectively, or preferably the latest available patch for those branches
- 5. Follow the standard GitHub Enterprise Server upgrade procedure documented at docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server/admin/install-and-upgrade-upgrading-github-enterprise-server
- 6. After upgrade, verify the version with: ghe-version
- 7. Test repository migration functionality to confirm the fix is working properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1355 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1355 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data