CVE-2026-13551
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in itsourcecode Baptism Information Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /editBaptism.php. Such manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Baptism Information Management System 1.0's /editBaptism.php file. The ID parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing attackers to inject malicious SQL queries. This remote unauthenticated vulnerability could allow attackers to read, modify, or delete database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Baptism Information Management System is installedSearch the web root directory for the file editBaptism.php or check for itsourcecode Baptism Information Management System application filesAffected if The application files are present on the system
-
Identify the installed versionCheck for version information in the application documentation, readme files, or application headers. Compare against version 1.0 mentioned in the CVEAffected if The installed version matches 1.0 or is an unpatched variant
-
Verify the editBaptism.php file exists and is accessibleLocate the editBaptism.php file within the web application directory structureAffected if The file exists in the web-accessible directory
-
Check if the application is network-accessibleDetermine if the web server hosting the application is reachable from untrusted networks (internet or DMZ)Affected if The application is exposed to unauthenticated network access without proper firewall restrictions
-
Examine the ID parameter handling in editBaptism.phpReview the source code of editBaptism.php to see if the ID parameter is used in raw SQL queries without parameterized queries or input sanitizationAffected if The ID parameter is directly concatenated into SQL queries without prepared statements or proper escaping
The environment is affected if the Baptism Information Management System version 1.0 is installed with the editBaptism.php file accessible over the network and the ID parameter contains unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements for the ID parameter in editBaptism.php. Apply input validation and principle of least privilege to the database user account.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-13551 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-13551 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data